Insights and limits of usability evaluation ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Insights and limits of usability evaluation methods along the health information technology lifecycle
Author(s) :
Marcilly, Romaric [Auteur]
Kushniruk, Andre W. [Auteur]
Beuscart-Zéphir, Marie-Catherine [Auteur]
Borycki, Elizabeth M. [Auteur]

Kushniruk, Andre W. [Auteur]
Beuscart-Zéphir, Marie-Catherine [Auteur]
Borycki, Elizabeth M. [Auteur]
Journal title :
Studies in health technology and informatics
Abbreviated title :
Stud Health Technol Inform
Volume number :
210
Pages :
115-9
Publication date :
2015-01-01
ISSN :
0926-9630
English keyword(s) :
Evaluation studies
Human engineering
Technology assessment
Medical errors
Human engineering
Technology assessment
Medical errors
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
A great variety of usability evaluation methods exist but they do not provide the same kind of results and do not address the same stage of the Health Information Technology (HIT) lifecycle. This paper takes stock of the ...
Show more >A great variety of usability evaluation methods exist but they do not provide the same kind of results and do not address the same stage of the Health Information Technology (HIT) lifecycle. This paper takes stock of the application of expert evaluation, usability testing, clinical simulation, clinical trials and post-implementation surveillance to provide an overview of their main similarities and differences. Results from this comparison will help in choosing methods that are best able to evaluate a HIT and improve its usability and ultimately its safety of use.Show less >
Show more >A great variety of usability evaluation methods exist but they do not provide the same kind of results and do not address the same stage of the Health Information Technology (HIT) lifecycle. This paper takes stock of the application of expert evaluation, usability testing, clinical simulation, clinical trials and post-implementation surveillance to provide an overview of their main similarities and differences. Results from this comparison will help in choosing methods that are best able to evaluate a HIT and improve its usability and ultimately its safety of use.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T18:19:59Z