Insights and limits of usability evaluation ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Insights and limits of usability evaluation methods along the health information technology lifecycle
Auteur(s) :
Marcilly, Romaric [Auteur]
Kushniruk, Andre W. [Auteur]
Beuscart-Zéphir, Marie-Catherine [Auteur]
Borycki, Elizabeth M. [Auteur]
Kushniruk, Andre W. [Auteur]
Beuscart-Zéphir, Marie-Catherine [Auteur]
Borycki, Elizabeth M. [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Studies in health technology and informatics
Nom court de la revue :
Stud Health Technol Inform
Numéro :
210
Pagination :
115-9
Date de publication :
2015-01-01
ISSN :
0926-9630
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Evaluation studies
Human engineering
Technology assessment
Medical errors
Human engineering
Technology assessment
Medical errors
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
A great variety of usability evaluation methods exist but they do not provide the same kind of results and do not address the same stage of the Health Information Technology (HIT) lifecycle. This paper takes stock of the ...
Lire la suite >A great variety of usability evaluation methods exist but they do not provide the same kind of results and do not address the same stage of the Health Information Technology (HIT) lifecycle. This paper takes stock of the application of expert evaluation, usability testing, clinical simulation, clinical trials and post-implementation surveillance to provide an overview of their main similarities and differences. Results from this comparison will help in choosing methods that are best able to evaluate a HIT and improve its usability and ultimately its safety of use.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >A great variety of usability evaluation methods exist but they do not provide the same kind of results and do not address the same stage of the Health Information Technology (HIT) lifecycle. This paper takes stock of the application of expert evaluation, usability testing, clinical simulation, clinical trials and post-implementation surveillance to provide an overview of their main similarities and differences. Results from this comparison will help in choosing methods that are best able to evaluate a HIT and improve its usability and ultimately its safety of use.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Date de dépôt :
2019-12-09T18:19:59Z