• English
    • français
  • Help
  •  | 
  • Contact
  •  | 
  • About
  •  | 
  • Login
  • HAL portal
  •  | 
  • Pages Pro
  • EN
  •  / 
  • FR
View Item 
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
  • View Item
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Experimentation to favor innovation: ...
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • Excel
  • RIS

Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
10.1016/j.therap.2018.11.010
PMID :
30683444
Permalink :
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/17429
Title :
Experimentation to favor innovation: promoting the success of article 51 transformation projects
Author(s) :
Townsend, Adeline [Auteur]
De Trogoff, Herve [Auteur]
Szwarcensztein, Karine [Auteur]
Journal title :
Therapie
Abbreviated title :
Therapie
Publication date :
2018-12-21
ISSN :
0040-5957
English keyword(s) :
Experimentation
Evaluation
Innovation
Organization
Article 51
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Article 51 of the French social security financing act for 2018 creates a derogatory funding system to support experimentation with new ways of organizing care pathways. The growing interest local leaders have expressed ...
Show more >
Article 51 of the French social security financing act for 2018 creates a derogatory funding system to support experimentation with new ways of organizing care pathways. The growing interest local leaders have expressed for this very open framework has led to a large number of candidate projects presented to public authorities in charge of the system. In order to sustain this dynamic movement and favor the success of these experimental projects, our work focused on clarifying the roles and responsibilities of project leaders and the need for a specific evaluation system that takes into account the evolving nature of these projects and the need for operational adaptability. We propose three levels of evaluation (feasibility, intermediary results and impact assessment) needed to decide on generalizing a given experiment based on its intermediary results, or on the contrary, terminating projects not meeting feasibility expectations. Our work emphasizes the importance of networking and of developing favorable conditions for fruitful collaboration between participating stakeholders-healthcare professionals, health providers, economic partners, learned societies-interested in improving the performance of care pathways.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Collections :
  • METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Submission date :
2019-12-09T18:20:45Z
Université de Lille

Mentions légales
Université de Lille © 2017