Titre :

Activation of manipulation and function knowledge during visual search for objects.

Auteur(s) :

Ruotolo, Francesco [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Kalénine, Solène [Auteur]
Bartolo, Angela [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]

Titre de la revue :

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance

Nom court de la revue :

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform

Numéro :

46

Pagination :

p. 66-90

Date de publication :

2020-01-01

ISSN :

1939-1277

Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :

Adolescent
Adult
Concept Formation
Eye Movements
Female
Fixation
Ocular
Humans
Male
Pattern Recognition
Visual
Photic Stimulation
Young Adult

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences cognitives

Résumé en anglais : [en]

This study aimed at comparing the time course of the activation of function and manipulation knowledge during object identification. The influence of visual similarity and context information was also assessed. In 3 ...
Lire la suite >This study aimed at comparing the time course of the activation of function and manipulation knowledge during object identification. The influence of visual similarity and context information was also assessed. In 3 eye-tracking experiments, conducted with the Visual-World-Paradigm, participants heard the name of an object and had to identify it among four pictures. The target object (e.g., ) could be presented along with objects related by (a) function (e.g., ), (b) manipulation (e.g., ), (c) context (e.g., ), (d) visual similarity (e.g., ), and (e) completely unrelated objects. Growth curve analyses were used to assess competition effects among semantically (a, b, and c), visually related (d), and unrelated competitors (e). Results showed that manipulation- and function-related, but not context-related objects received more fixations than the unrelated ones, with a temporal advantage for the manipulation-related objects (Experiment 1). However, the visually similar objects faded the semantic competition effects, especially for function-related objects (Experiment 2). Finally, no temporal differences appeared when manipulation- and function-related objects were shown within the same visual array (Experiment 3). These results support the idea that both function and manipulation are relevant features of object semantic representations, but in the absence of other semantic competitors the activation of manipulation features appears prioritized during object identification. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Établissement(s) :

Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille

Collections :

• Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193

Date de dépôt :

2020-01-16T16:16:43Z
2020-01-21T11:15:21Z
2020-02-14T09:46:19Z
2023-03-28T07:14:10Z