Procedural Coordination in the Matching Task

Knutsen, Dominique; Bangerter, Adrian; Mayor, Eric

Type de document :

Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original

DOI :

10.1525/collabra.188

URL permanente :

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/18844

Titre :

Procedural Coordination in the Matching Task

Auteur(s) :

Knutsen, Dominique [Auteur]

Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Bangerter, Adrian [Auteur]
Université de Neuchâtel = University of Neuchatel [UNINE]
Mayor, Eric [Auteur]
Université de Neuchâtel = University of Neuchatel [UNINE]

Titre de la revue :

Collabra: Psychology

Numéro :

Pagination :

Éditeur :

University of California Press

Date de publication :

2019-01-08

ISSN :

2474-7394

Résumé en anglais : [en]

Participants in conversation who recurrently discuss the same targets require fewer and fewer words to identify them. This has been attributed to the collaborative elaboration of conceptual pacts, that is, semantic ...
Lire la suite >Participants in conversation who recurrently discuss the same targets require fewer and fewer words to identify them. This has been attributed to the collaborative elaboration of conceptual pacts, that is, semantic coordination. But participants do not only coordinate on the semantics of referring expressions; they also coordinate on how to do the task, that is, on procedural coordination. In a matching task experiment (n = 22 dyads), we examined the development of four aspects of procedural coordination: Card placement (CP), implicit generic coordination (IGC), explicit generic coordination (EGC) and general procedural coordination (GPC) in two conditions (the classic condition where targets remain the same over trials, and a new cards condition, where they change at each trial, thus increasing the difficulty of semantic coordination). Procedural coordination constituted almost 30% of the total amount of talk in the matching task. Procedural coordination was more effortful when semantic coordination was more difficult and the four aspects of procedural coordination developed differently depending on participant roles.Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Comité de lecture :

Oui

Audience :

Non spécifiée

Établissement(s) :

Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille

Collections :

Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193

Équipe(s) de recherche :

Équipe Langage

Date de dépôt :

2020-03-04T09:01:59Z
2020-03-16T14:16:20Z

Fichiers

Knutsen et al., 2019, Collabra.pdf
Version éditeur
Accès libre
Accéder au document

Numéro de version	Lien	Date de modification
2	20.500.12210/18844*	2020-03-16T14:15:27Z
1	20.500.12210/18844.1	2020-03-04T09:01:59Z

Procedural Coordination in the Matching Task

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS

Fichiers

Historique des modifications

Procedural Coordination in the Matching Task BibTeX CSV Excel RIS

Fichiers

Historique des modifications

Procedural Coordination in the Matching Task

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS