Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons.
Auteur(s) :
Gipson, Cassandra D [Auteur]
University of Kentucky [UK]
Alessandri, Jerome [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche en Sciences Cognitives et Affectives [URECA]
Miller, Holly C [Auteur]
University of Kentucky [UK]
Zentall, Thomas R [Auteur]
University of Kentucky [UK]
University of Kentucky [UK]
Alessandri, Jerome [Auteur]

Unité de Recherche en Sciences Cognitives et Affectives [URECA]
Miller, Holly C [Auteur]
University of Kentucky [UK]
Zentall, Thomas R [Auteur]
University of Kentucky [UK]
Titre de la revue :
Learning & Behavior
Nom court de la revue :
Learn Behav
Numéro :
37
Pagination :
289-98
Date de publication :
2009-11-01
ISSN :
1543-4494
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Animals
Choice Behavior
Columbidae
Conditioning
Operant
Models
Psychological
Reinforcement Schedule
Reinforcement
Psychology
Choice Behavior
Columbidae
Conditioning
Operant
Models
Psychological
Reinforcement Schedule
Reinforcement
Psychology
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
When pigeons are given a choice between an initial-link alternative that results in either a terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement or a stimulus correlated with 0% reinforcement (overall 50% reinforcement) ...
Lire la suite >When pigeons are given a choice between an initial-link alternative that results in either a terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement or a stimulus correlated with 0% reinforcement (overall 50% reinforcement) and another initial-link alternative that always results in a terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement, some pigeons show a preference for the initial-link alternative correlated with 50% reinforcement. Using this procedure, in Experiment 1, we found a relatively modest preference for 100% over 50% reinforcement. In Experiment 2, we decreased the reinforcement density for the second initial-link alternative to 75% and found a significant preference for the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative. It may be that this "maladaptive" behavior results from a positive contrast between the expectation of reinforcement correlated with the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative and the terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement. But apparently, the complementary negative contrast does not develop between the expectation of reinforcement correlated with the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative and the terminal-link stimulus correlated with 0% reinforcement that often follow. Such paradoxical choice may account for certain human appetitive risk-taking behavior (e.g., gambling) as well.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >When pigeons are given a choice between an initial-link alternative that results in either a terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement or a stimulus correlated with 0% reinforcement (overall 50% reinforcement) and another initial-link alternative that always results in a terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement, some pigeons show a preference for the initial-link alternative correlated with 50% reinforcement. Using this procedure, in Experiment 1, we found a relatively modest preference for 100% over 50% reinforcement. In Experiment 2, we decreased the reinforcement density for the second initial-link alternative to 75% and found a significant preference for the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative. It may be that this "maladaptive" behavior results from a positive contrast between the expectation of reinforcement correlated with the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative and the terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement. But apparently, the complementary negative contrast does not develop between the expectation of reinforcement correlated with the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative and the terminal-link stimulus correlated with 0% reinforcement that often follow. Such paradoxical choice may account for certain human appetitive risk-taking behavior (e.g., gambling) as well.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2020-03-27T13:11:54Z
2020-03-31T08:38:49Z
2020-04-02T09:40:11Z
2020-04-06T11:53:30Z
2020-03-31T08:38:49Z
2020-04-02T09:40:11Z
2020-04-06T11:53:30Z
Fichiers
- Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document