Inter-day test–retest reliability and ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Permalink :
Title :
Inter-day test–retest reliability and feasibility of isokinetic, isometric, and isotonic measurements to assess quadriceps endurance in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A multicenter study
Author(s) :
Frykholm, Erik [Auteur]
Gephine, Sarah [Auteur]
Saey, Didier [Auteur]
Van Hees, Hieronymus [Auteur]
Lemson, Arthur [Auteur]
Klijn, Peter [Auteur]
Maltais, François [Auteur]
Nyberg, André [Auteur]
Gephine, Sarah [Auteur]
Saey, Didier [Auteur]
Van Hees, Hieronymus [Auteur]
Lemson, Arthur [Auteur]
Klijn, Peter [Auteur]
Maltais, François [Auteur]
Nyberg, André [Auteur]
Journal title :
Chronic respiratory disease
Volume number :
16
Pages :
1-9
Publication date :
2018-10
English abstract : [en]
The aims were to determine reliability and feasibility of measurements to assess quadriceps endurance in people withchronicobstructive pulmonary disease.Sixty participants(forcedexpiratoryvolumein one second(mean+ standard ...
Show more >The aims were to determine reliability and feasibility of measurements to assess quadriceps endurance in people withchronicobstructive pulmonary disease.Sixty participants(forcedexpiratoryvolumein one second(mean+ standard deviation) 55 + 18% of predicted, age 67 + 8 years) were tested in an inter-day, test–retest design. Isokinetic, isometric, and isotonic protocols were performed using a computerized dynamometer. Test–retest relative and absolute reliability was determined via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), and limits of agreement (LoA%). Isokinetic total work demonstrated very high relative reliability (ICC: [95% confidence interval] ¼ 0.98 [0.94–0.99]) and the best absolute reliability (CV% (LoA%) ¼ 6.5% (18.0%)). Isokinetic fatigue index, isometric, and isotonic measures demonstrated low-to-high relative reliability (ICC ¼ 0.64 [0.46–0.77], 0.88 [0.76–0.94], 0.91 [0.85–0.94]), and measures of absolute reliability (CV% (LoA%)) were 20.3% (56.4%), 14.9% (40.8%), and 15.8% (43.1%). For isokinetic total work and isometric measurements, participants performed better on retest (4.8% and 10.0%, respectively). The feasibility was similar across protocols with an average time consumption of less than 7.5 minutes. In conclusion, isokinetic, isometric, and isotonic measurements ofquadriceps endurance were feasible toa similar extent and presented low-to-very high relative reliability. Absolute reliability seems to favor isokinetic total work measurements.Show less >
Show more >The aims were to determine reliability and feasibility of measurements to assess quadriceps endurance in people withchronicobstructive pulmonary disease.Sixty participants(forcedexpiratoryvolumein one second(mean+ standard deviation) 55 + 18% of predicted, age 67 + 8 years) were tested in an inter-day, test–retest design. Isokinetic, isometric, and isotonic protocols were performed using a computerized dynamometer. Test–retest relative and absolute reliability was determined via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), and limits of agreement (LoA%). Isokinetic total work demonstrated very high relative reliability (ICC: [95% confidence interval] ¼ 0.98 [0.94–0.99]) and the best absolute reliability (CV% (LoA%) ¼ 6.5% (18.0%)). Isokinetic fatigue index, isometric, and isotonic measures demonstrated low-to-high relative reliability (ICC ¼ 0.64 [0.46–0.77], 0.88 [0.76–0.94], 0.91 [0.85–0.94]), and measures of absolute reliability (CV% (LoA%)) were 20.3% (56.4%), 14.9% (40.8%), and 15.8% (43.1%). For isokinetic total work and isometric measurements, participants performed better on retest (4.8% and 10.0%, respectively). The feasibility was similar across protocols with an average time consumption of less than 7.5 minutes. In conclusion, isokinetic, isometric, and isotonic measurements ofquadriceps endurance were feasible toa similar extent and presented low-to-very high relative reliability. Absolute reliability seems to favor isokinetic total work measurements.Show less >
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Univ. Artois
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Univ. Artois
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Research team(s) :
Activité Physique, Muscle, Santé (APMS)
Submission date :
2020-04-01T16:44:57Z
Files
- Articles-RFEQ-publié-CRD-2018.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Open access
- Access the document