Exploring cost dominance in crop farming ...
Document type :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
Title :
Exploring cost dominance in crop farming systems between high and low pesticide use
Author(s) :
Boussemart, Jean Philippe [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
UFR de Mathématiques, Informatique, Management, Economie [UFR MIME]
Leleu, Herve [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Université Catholique de Lille - Faculté de gestion, économie et sciences [UCL FGES]
Ojo, Oluwaseun [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]

Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
UFR de Mathématiques, Informatique, Management, Economie [UFR MIME]
Leleu, Herve [Auteur]

Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Université Catholique de Lille - Faculté de gestion, économie et sciences [UCL FGES]
Ojo, Oluwaseun [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Journal title :
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Pages :
197--214
Publisher :
Springer Verlag
Publication date :
2015-04
ISSN :
0895-562X
English keyword(s) :
Pesticide use (PU)
Arable crops farming systems
Activity analysis model (AAM)
Non parametric robust cost function (NPRCF)
Hamming distance (HD)
Arable crops farming systems
Activity analysis model (AAM)
Non parametric robust cost function (NPRCF)
Hamming distance (HD)
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Economies et finances
English abstract : [en]
The purpose of this paper is to assess cost dominance in direct inputs between arable crop-based systems using low or high pesticide levels per hectare. Our investigation departs from a traditional efficiency analysis and ...
Show more >The purpose of this paper is to assess cost dominance in direct inputs between arable crop-based systems using low or high pesticide levels per hectare. Our investigation departs from a traditional efficiency analysis and aims at comparing two minimal direct cost functions excluding pesticide expenses. This means that we evaluate the gap between two efficient frontiers instead of focusing on individual farm inefficiency scores. Our only objective is to compare two optimal cost benchmarks for systems respectively defined with high or low pesticide levels per hectare by varying their scale and output mix. A robust approach frontier is introduced to control the influence of potential outliers and unobserved heterogeneity. Based on 707 French crop farms observed in 2008, our simulations show that agricultural practices using less pesticide per hectare are unambiguously more cost-competitive in terms of direct inputs while inducing no other substitution costs. This cost dominance is a robust phenomenon regardless of the size and scope of crop activities, which supports more ecofriendly practices.Show less >
Show more >The purpose of this paper is to assess cost dominance in direct inputs between arable crop-based systems using low or high pesticide levels per hectare. Our investigation departs from a traditional efficiency analysis and aims at comparing two minimal direct cost functions excluding pesticide expenses. This means that we evaluate the gap between two efficient frontiers instead of focusing on individual farm inefficiency scores. Our only objective is to compare two optimal cost benchmarks for systems respectively defined with high or low pesticide levels per hectare by varying their scale and output mix. A robust approach frontier is introduced to control the influence of potential outliers and unobserved heterogeneity. Based on 707 French crop farms observed in 2008, our simulations show that agricultural practices using less pesticide per hectare are unambiguously more cost-competitive in terms of direct inputs while inducing no other substitution costs. This cost dominance is a robust phenomenon regardless of the size and scope of crop activities, which supports more ecofriendly practices.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :