• English
    • français
  • Help
  •  | 
  • Contact
  •  | 
  • About
  •  | 
  • Login
  • HAL portal
  •  | 
  • Pages Pro
  • EN
  •  / 
  • FR
View Item 
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille (CRIStAL) - UMR 9189
  • View Item
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille (CRIStAL) - UMR 9189
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of Spatial and Temporal Interaction ...
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • Excel
  • RIS

Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
10.1007/s12193-019-00314-x
Title :
Comparison of Spatial and Temporal Interaction Techniques for 3D Audio Trajectory Authoring
Author(s) :
Mathew, Justin [Auteur]
Audio et Acoustique [AA]
Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique [LRI]
Technology and knowledge for interaction [LOKI]
Huot, Stephane [Auteur] refId
Technology and knowledge for interaction [LOKI]
Katz, Brian [Auteur]
Lutheries - Acoustique - Musique [IJLRDA-LAM]
Journal title :
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
Publisher :
Springer
Publication date :
2020-03-01
ISSN :
1783-7677
English keyword(s) :
3DUI
3D Audio
Human–computer interaction
HAL domain(s) :
Informatique [cs]/Interface homme-machine [cs.HC]
Informatique [cs]/Multimédia [cs.MM]
Informatique [cs]/Son [cs.SD]
Informatique [cs]
English abstract : [en]
With the popularity of immersive media, developing usable tools for content development is important for the production process. In the context of 3D audio production, user interfaces for authoring and editing 3D audio ...
Show more >
With the popularity of immersive media, developing usable tools for content development is important for the production process. In the context of 3D audio production, user interfaces for authoring and editing 3D audio trajectories enable content developers, composers, practitioners, and recording and mixing engineers to define how audio sources travel in time. However , common interaction techniques in 3D audio production tools can make the workflow of this task tedious and difficult to accomplish. This study investigates this problem by classifying the atomic tasks (spatially and temporally) of a general composite task of authoring 3D audio trajectories and then evaluating different interaction techniques across these tasks. Common graphical user interfaces were compared with input devices having varying degrees-of-freedom for spatial atomic tasks in order to investigate the effect of direct manipulation and integrality of interaction techniques. Continuous and discrete interaction techniques were compared for temporal tasks in order to investigate the effect of direct manipulation. Results suggest that interaction techniques with high degrees of integrality and direct manipulation reduce task completion time compared to standard GUI techniques. The design of temporal tasks can create a visual bias, and discrete-time controls can be a suitable method for traversing a small number of control points. These results and further observations provide directions on the study of interaction technique design for 3D audio tools, which in turn should improve workflows of 3D audio content creation.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
  • Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille (CRIStAL) - UMR 9189
Source :
Harvested from HAL
Files
Thumbnail
  • https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02375493/document
  • Open access
  • Access the document
Thumbnail
  • https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02375493/document
  • Open access
  • Access the document
Thumbnail
  • https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02375493/document
  • Open access
  • Access the document
Université de Lille

Mentions légales
Université de Lille © 2017