Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting ...
Type de document :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
Titre :
Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting an Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System
Auteur(s) :
Morge, Maxime [Auteur]
Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille [LIFL]
Systèmes Multi-Agents et Comportements [SMAC]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Mancarella, Paolo [Auteur]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille [LIFL]
Systèmes Multi-Agents et Comportements [SMAC]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Mancarella, Paolo [Auteur]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Titre de la revue :
Group Decision and Negotiation
Pagination :
979-1012
Éditeur :
INFORMS
Date de publication :
2014
ISSN :
0926-2644
Discipline(s) HAL :
Informatique [cs]/Intelligence artificielle [cs.AI]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Computational models of argumentation has been put forward as a promising approach to support decision making. In this context several recent works have proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision making. In this ...
Lire la suite >Computational models of argumentation has been put forward as a promising approach to support decision making. In this context several recent works have proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision making. In this paper we describe an application based on an argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making to concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of argumentation, we propose an argumentation framework in which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are defined as tree-like structures. Our framework is equipped with a computational counterpart for solving a decision problem, modeling the intuition that high-ranked goals are preferred to low-ranked goals which can be withdrawn. In this way, our framework suggests some decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice. Our implementation, called MARGO, has been used for service selection within the ArguGRID project. We illustrate our approach with an industrial application, and illustrate the operation of the system with a running example.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Computational models of argumentation has been put forward as a promising approach to support decision making. In this context several recent works have proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision making. In this paper we describe an application based on an argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making to concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of argumentation, we propose an argumentation framework in which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are defined as tree-like structures. Our framework is equipped with a computational counterpart for solving a decision problem, modeling the intuition that high-ranked goals are preferred to low-ranked goals which can be withdrawn. In this way, our framework suggests some decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice. Our implementation, called MARGO, has been used for service selection within the ArguGRID project. We illustrate our approach with an industrial application, and illustrate the operation of the system with a running example.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :
Fichiers
- https://openresearchlibrary.org/ext/api/media/0af241e5-de05-49e6-806d-2fbaeae0cf4b/assets/external_content.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- external_content.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document