A subjective experiment for 3D-mesh ...
Type de document :
Communication dans un congrès avec actes
Titre :
A subjective experiment for 3D-mesh segmentation evaluation
Auteur(s) :
Benhabiles, Halim [Auteur]
FOX MIIRE [LIFL]
Lavoué, Guillaume [Auteur]
Geometry Processing and Constrained Optimization [M2DisCo]
Vandeborre, Jean Philippe [Auteur correspondant]
Institut TELECOM/TELECOM Lille1
FOX MIIRE [LIFL]
Daoudi, Mohamed [Auteur]
Institut TELECOM/TELECOM Lille1
FOX MIIRE [LIFL]

FOX MIIRE [LIFL]
Lavoué, Guillaume [Auteur]
Geometry Processing and Constrained Optimization [M2DisCo]
Vandeborre, Jean Philippe [Auteur correspondant]

Institut TELECOM/TELECOM Lille1
FOX MIIRE [LIFL]
Daoudi, Mohamed [Auteur]

Institut TELECOM/TELECOM Lille1
FOX MIIRE [LIFL]
Éditeur(s) ou directeur(s) scientifique(s) :
IEEE
Titre de la manifestation scientifique :
IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP'2010)
Ville :
Saint-Malo
Pays :
France
Date de début de la manifestation scientifique :
2010-10-04
Éditeur :
IEEE
Date de publication :
2010-10
Discipline(s) HAL :
Informatique [cs]/Vision par ordinateur et reconnaissance de formes [cs.CV]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
In this paper we present a subjective quality assessment experiment for 3D-mesh segmentation. For this end, we carefully designed a protocol with respect to several factors namely the rendering conditions, the possible ...
Lire la suite >In this paper we present a subjective quality assessment experiment for 3D-mesh segmentation. For this end, we carefully designed a protocol with respect to several factors namely the rendering conditions, the possible interactions, the rating range, and the number of human subjects. To carry out the subjective experiment, more than 40 human observers have rated a set of 250 segmentation results issued from various algorithms. The obtained Mean Opinion Scores, which represent the human subjects' point of view toward the quality of each segmentation, have then been used to evaluate both the quality of automatic segmentation algorithms and the quality of similarity metrics used in recent mesh segmentation benchmarking systems.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >In this paper we present a subjective quality assessment experiment for 3D-mesh segmentation. For this end, we carefully designed a protocol with respect to several factors namely the rendering conditions, the possible interactions, the rating range, and the number of human subjects. To carry out the subjective experiment, more than 40 human observers have rated a set of 250 segmentation results issued from various algorithms. The obtained Mean Opinion Scores, which represent the human subjects' point of view toward the quality of each segmentation, have then been used to evaluate both the quality of automatic segmentation algorithms and the quality of similarity metrics used in recent mesh segmentation benchmarking systems.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :
Fichiers
- https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00666767/document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00666767/document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00666767/document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- benhabilesMMSP2010.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document