• English
    • français
  • Help
  •  | 
  • Contact
  •  | 
  • About
  •  | 
  • Login
  • HAL portal
  •  | 
  • Pages Pro
  • EN
  •  / 
  • FR
View Item 
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille (CRIStAL) - UMR 9189
  • View Item
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille (CRIStAL) - UMR 9189
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

No more bricolage! Methods and tools to ...
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • Excel
  • RIS

Document type :
Communication dans un congrès avec actes
DOI :
10.1145/2047196.2047276
Title :
No more bricolage! Methods and tools to characterize, replicate and compare pointing transfer functions
Author(s) :
Casiez, Géry [Auteur] refId
Methods and tools for gestural interactions [MINT]
Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille [LIFL]
Roussel, Nicolas [Auteur]
Methods and tools for gestural interactions [MINT]
Conference title :
UIST'11, 24th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
City :
Santa Barbara
Country :
Etats-Unis d'Amérique
Start date of the conference :
2011-10-16
Publication date :
2011-10-19
HAL domain(s) :
Informatique [cs]/Interface homme-machine [cs.HC]
English abstract : [en]
Transfer functions are the only pointing facilitation technique actually used in modern graphical interfaces involving the in- direct control of an on-screen cursor. But despite their gen- eral use, very little is known ...
Show more >
Transfer functions are the only pointing facilitation technique actually used in modern graphical interfaces involving the in- direct control of an on-screen cursor. But despite their gen- eral use, very little is known about them. We present Echo- Mouse, a device we created to characterize the transfer func- tions of any system, and libpointing, a toolkit that we devel- oped to replicate and compare the ones used by Windows, OS X and Xorg. We describe these functions and report on an experiment that compared the default one of the three sys- tems. Our results show that these default functions improve performance up to 24% compared to a unitless constant CD gain. We also found significant differences between them, with the one from OS X improving performance for small target widths but reducing its performance up to 9% for larger ones compared to Windows and Xorg. These results notably suggest replacing the constant CD gain function commonly used by HCI researchers by the default function of the con- sidered systems.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
  • Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille (CRIStAL) - UMR 9189
Source :
Harvested from HAL
Université de Lille

Mentions légales
Accessibilité : non conforme
Université de Lille © 2017