Estimating each other's memory biases in dialogue
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
URL permanente :
Titre :
Estimating each other's memory biases in dialogue
Auteur(s) :
Knutsen, Dominique [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Le Bigot, Ludovic [Auteur]
Centre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage [UMR 7295] [CeRCA [Poitiers, Tours]]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Le Bigot, Ludovic [Auteur]
Centre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage [UMR 7295] [CeRCA [Poitiers, Tours]]
Titre de la revue :
Discourse Processes
Numéro :
58
Pagination :
155-176
Éditeur :
Taylor & Francis
Date de publication :
2020-11-19
ISSN :
0163-853X
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Conversational memory is subject to a number of biases. For instance, references which were reused during dialogue are remembered better than non-reused references. Two experiments examined whether speakers are aware that ...
Lire la suite >Conversational memory is subject to a number of biases. For instance, references which were reused during dialogue are remembered better than non-reused references. Two experiments examined whether speakers are aware that they are subject to such biases and whether they use information about reference origin (i.e., information about who said what) to determine which references are remembered better by their partner. Pairs of participants performed a map task followed by a questionnaire that assessed each participant’s content memory as well as each participant’s estimation of his or her partner’s memory. In Experiment 1, the participants were unaware that they would perform a memory test after the map task, whereas the participants were mutually aware of the upcoming memory test in Experiment 2. The results revealed that participants did know that their partner was subject to memory biases and that their estimation of these biases was mainly accurate. The results prevented us from drawing any conclusions about the role of origin memory in this process. These results have important implications for subsequent dialogic partner-adaptation.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Conversational memory is subject to a number of biases. For instance, references which were reused during dialogue are remembered better than non-reused references. Two experiments examined whether speakers are aware that they are subject to such biases and whether they use information about reference origin (i.e., information about who said what) to determine which references are remembered better by their partner. Pairs of participants performed a map task followed by a questionnaire that assessed each participant’s content memory as well as each participant’s estimation of his or her partner’s memory. In Experiment 1, the participants were unaware that they would perform a memory test after the map task, whereas the participants were mutually aware of the upcoming memory test in Experiment 2. The results revealed that participants did know that their partner was subject to memory biases and that their estimation of these biases was mainly accurate. The results prevented us from drawing any conclusions about the role of origin memory in this process. These results have important implications for subsequent dialogic partner-adaptation.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Équipe Langage
Date de dépôt :
2020-11-24T16:01:42Z
2020-11-30T10:24:29Z
2020-12-11T08:27:46Z
2023-01-06T09:35:43Z
2023-01-11T07:06:36Z
2020-11-30T10:24:29Z
2020-12-11T08:27:46Z
2023-01-06T09:35:43Z
2023-01-11T07:06:36Z
Fichiers
- K&LB 2020.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès confidentiel
- Accéder au document