Trends in Worldwide Research in Hypertension ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article de synthèse/Review paper
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Trends in Worldwide Research in Hypertension Over the Period 1999-2018: A Bibliometric Study.
Auteur(s) :
Devos, Patrick [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ménard, Joël [Auteur]
CIC - HEGP [CIC 1418]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ménard, Joël [Auteur]
CIC - HEGP [CIC 1418]
Titre de la revue :
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)
Nom court de la revue :
Hypertension
Numéro :
76
Pagination :
1649-1655
Date de publication :
2020-11-01
ISSN :
1524-4563
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
PubMed
bibliometrics
category normalized citation impact
publications
specialization index
bibliometrics
category normalized citation impact
publications
specialization index
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Bibliometric analysis, a powerful tool for assessing trends in research output, was employed to analyze the evolution of hypertension research over a 20-year period. The analysis was based on 90 308 original articles and ...
Lire la suite >Bibliometric analysis, a powerful tool for assessing trends in research output, was employed to analyze the evolution of hypertension research over a 20-year period. The analysis was based on 90 308 original articles and a citation analysis. The use of bibliometric as a potential tool for shaping research policy at the institution or country level was also explored. The number of published hypertension articles increased by 43.5% over the 20-year period. By contrast, the increase in the number of articles in all medical disciplines was 96%, and in the cardiovascular field was 64%. Of the 6 countries producing the largest number of articles, the United States was consistently the major contributor. There was a slight decrease from Japan, a slight increase from the United Kingdom, and relatively stable output from Germany and Italy over the study period. Output from China showed the strongest growth. The trends in Specialization Index and Category Normalized Citation Impact varied by country. In Russia, Poland, and Brazil, increases in output were greater for hypertension research than for medical research in general. The United Kingdom and Denmark had greater hypertension research output than the other countries. VOSviewer analysis showed an intensification of collaborations between countries and a shift, over 10 years, from 3 clusters towards 2 clusters. Such analysis may help to shape research policy at the country level and can be similarly performed for institutions. Historical changes in hypertension research can be monitored over decades if the same channels continue to be used for communication of scientific results.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Bibliometric analysis, a powerful tool for assessing trends in research output, was employed to analyze the evolution of hypertension research over a 20-year period. The analysis was based on 90 308 original articles and a citation analysis. The use of bibliometric as a potential tool for shaping research policy at the institution or country level was also explored. The number of published hypertension articles increased by 43.5% over the 20-year period. By contrast, the increase in the number of articles in all medical disciplines was 96%, and in the cardiovascular field was 64%. Of the 6 countries producing the largest number of articles, the United States was consistently the major contributor. There was a slight decrease from Japan, a slight increase from the United Kingdom, and relatively stable output from Germany and Italy over the study period. Output from China showed the strongest growth. The trends in Specialization Index and Category Normalized Citation Impact varied by country. In Russia, Poland, and Brazil, increases in output were greater for hypertension research than for medical research in general. The United Kingdom and Denmark had greater hypertension research output than the other countries. VOSviewer analysis showed an intensification of collaborations between countries and a shift, over 10 years, from 3 clusters towards 2 clusters. Such analysis may help to shape research policy at the country level and can be similarly performed for institutions. Historical changes in hypertension research can be monitored over decades if the same channels continue to be used for communication of scientific results.Lire moins >
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CHU Lille
CHU Lille
Date de dépôt :
2020-11-29T16:20:32Z
2020-11-30T09:16:10Z
2020-11-30T09:34:12Z
2020-11-30T09:16:10Z
2020-11-30T09:34:12Z
Fichiers
- HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15711.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document