Comparison of the performance of the biofilm ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Permalink :
Title :
Comparison of the performance of the biofilm sampling methods (swab, sponge, contact agar) in the recovery of Listeria monocytogenes populations considering the seafood environment conditions
Author(s) :
Faille, Christine [Auteur]
Unité Matériaux et Transformations - UMR 8207 [UMET]
Brauge, Thomas [Auteur]
Leleu, Guylaine [Auteur]
Hanin, Aurélie [Auteur]
Denis, Catherine [Auteur]
Midelet, Graziella [Auteur]
Unité Matériaux et Transformations - UMR 8207 [UMET]
Brauge, Thomas [Auteur]
Leleu, Guylaine [Auteur]
Hanin, Aurélie [Auteur]
Denis, Catherine [Auteur]
Midelet, Graziella [Auteur]
Journal title :
International journal of food microbiology
Abbreviated title :
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Volume number :
325
Pages :
108626
Publisher :
Elsevier BV
Publication date :
2020-07-16
ISSN :
0168-1605
English keyword(s) :
Listeria monocytogenes
Biofilm
Sampling methods
VBNC
Underestimation
Seafood
Neutralizing buffer
Biofilm
Sampling methods
VBNC
Underestimation
Seafood
Neutralizing buffer
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Ingénierie des aliments
English abstract : [en]
Aims :
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of sampling methods [contact plates, sponges, and swabs] in the recovery of biofilm Listeria monocytogenes populations considering the seafood environment ...
Show more >Aims : The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of sampling methods [contact plates, sponges, and swabs] in the recovery of biofilm Listeria monocytogenes populations considering the seafood environment conditions (nature of conditioning, of materials and bacterial species). Methods and results : Different materials (stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane) were conditioned with two fish filtrates, the ready-to-eat the most consumed in Europe (smoked salmon, cod). After, we added the suspension of Listeria monocytogenes, alone or with Pseudomonas fluorescens or Carnobacterium strains, and incubated for 48 h at 8 °C. Then, the 48 h-biofilms were sampled with different methods (contact plates, sponges, and swabs). The cultivable bacterial populations were enumerated on agar, while the L. monocytogenes total and viable populations were quantified by qPCR and propidium monoazide-qPCR (PMA-qPCR), respectively. The amount of L. monocytogenes in biofilms was affected only by the nature of the conditioning with lowest adherent bacteria with cod versus with smoked salmon conditioning. Considering the amount of total population, the swab displayed the lowest values versus the sponges and the contact plates. An explanation was that the observations of the swab by microscopy showed the bacteria trapped within it. The recovery of cultivable bacterial populations was not significantly different with the three sampling methods. On the contrary, we showed that the VBNC populations were only detached by two of three methods (contact plates, sponges) while for the dead populations, those were contact plates and swabs. Conclusions : The nature of the conditioning influenced the amount of the bacteria in biofilms. And the performance of the recovery of the bacterial populations (dead, VBNC, cultivable) was dependent on the methods used. Significance and impact of the study : This study showed that the seafood environmental conditions influenced the biofilm formation and the assessment of the efficiency of cleaning and disinfectant operations could be significantly affected by the used sampling methods.Show less >
Show more >Aims : The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of sampling methods [contact plates, sponges, and swabs] in the recovery of biofilm Listeria monocytogenes populations considering the seafood environment conditions (nature of conditioning, of materials and bacterial species). Methods and results : Different materials (stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane) were conditioned with two fish filtrates, the ready-to-eat the most consumed in Europe (smoked salmon, cod). After, we added the suspension of Listeria monocytogenes, alone or with Pseudomonas fluorescens or Carnobacterium strains, and incubated for 48 h at 8 °C. Then, the 48 h-biofilms were sampled with different methods (contact plates, sponges, and swabs). The cultivable bacterial populations were enumerated on agar, while the L. monocytogenes total and viable populations were quantified by qPCR and propidium monoazide-qPCR (PMA-qPCR), respectively. The amount of L. monocytogenes in biofilms was affected only by the nature of the conditioning with lowest adherent bacteria with cod versus with smoked salmon conditioning. Considering the amount of total population, the swab displayed the lowest values versus the sponges and the contact plates. An explanation was that the observations of the swab by microscopy showed the bacteria trapped within it. The recovery of cultivable bacterial populations was not significantly different with the three sampling methods. On the contrary, we showed that the VBNC populations were only detached by two of three methods (contact plates, sponges) while for the dead populations, those were contact plates and swabs. Conclusions : The nature of the conditioning influenced the amount of the bacteria in biofilms. And the performance of the recovery of the bacterial populations (dead, VBNC, cultivable) was dependent on the methods used. Significance and impact of the study : This study showed that the seafood environmental conditions influenced the biofilm formation and the assessment of the efficiency of cleaning and disinfectant operations could be significantly affected by the used sampling methods.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
INRA
ENSCL
CNRS
INRA
ENSCL
Collections :
Research team(s) :
Processus aux Interfaces et Hygiène des Matériaux (PIHM)
Submission date :
2020-12-08T16:02:04Z