Are the evaluation criteria used in ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Are the evaluation criteria used in preclinical endodontic training courses relevant? a preliminary study
Author(s) :
Vantorre, Trystan [Auteur]
425779|||Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille] (VALID)
Becavin, Thibault [Auteur]
Médicaments et Biomatériaux à libération contrôlée : Mécanismes et Optimisation - U1008 [MBLC]
106179|||Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS] (VALID)
Deveaux, Etienne [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
106179|||Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS] (VALID)
Marchandise, Pierre [Auteur]
Unité de Taphonomie Médico-Légale & d’Anatomie (UTMLA) - ULR 7367
Chai, Feng [Auteur]
Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS]
Robberecht, Lieven [Auteur]
106179|||Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS] (VALID)
425779|||Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille] (VALID)
Becavin, Thibault [Auteur]

Médicaments et Biomatériaux à libération contrôlée : Mécanismes et Optimisation - U1008 [MBLC]
106179|||Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS] (VALID)
Deveaux, Etienne [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
106179|||Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS] (VALID)
Marchandise, Pierre [Auteur]
Unité de Taphonomie Médico-Légale & d’Anatomie (UTMLA) - ULR 7367
Chai, Feng [Auteur]
Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS]
Robberecht, Lieven [Auteur]

106179|||Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS] (VALID)
Journal title :
Australian Endodontic Journal
Abbreviated title :
Aust Endod J
Volume number :
46
Pages :
374-380
Publisher :
Wiley Online Library
Publication date :
2020-07-12
ISSN :
1747-4477
English keyword(s) :
evaluation
evaluation of clinical performance
endodontics
X-ray microtomography
preclinical skills
evaluation of clinical performance
endodontics
X-ray microtomography
preclinical skills
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
This study aimed to evaluate the relevance of a conventional evaluation protocol (CEP) for preclinical endodontic training. Seven dental students performed root canal treatments on an extracted human molar which was then ...
Show more >This study aimed to evaluate the relevance of a conventional evaluation protocol (CEP) for preclinical endodontic training. Seven dental students performed root canal treatments on an extracted human molar which was then evaluated by CEP (clinical and radiographic observations, including preparing the access cavities, preparing and filling the root canal, and detecting iatrogenic errors). A reference evaluation protocol (REP) based on micro-computed tomographic images analysis was used as a control. The evaluation scores obtained by CEP and REP were compared using a non-parametric Wilcoxon's test. CEP was relevant for access cavity, irrigation, working length and ledge detection training but was no more effective than the REP for evaluating the apical diameter and taper of the root canals, the quality of the fillings, and the presence of perforations and fractured instruments using retro-alveolar radiographs. The conventional evaluation criteria used in preclinical endodontics should be used with care to detect 'unsafe' students.Show less >
Show more >This study aimed to evaluate the relevance of a conventional evaluation protocol (CEP) for preclinical endodontic training. Seven dental students performed root canal treatments on an extracted human molar which was then evaluated by CEP (clinical and radiographic observations, including preparing the access cavities, preparing and filling the root canal, and detecting iatrogenic errors). A reference evaluation protocol (REP) based on micro-computed tomographic images analysis was used as a control. The evaluation scores obtained by CEP and REP were compared using a non-parametric Wilcoxon's test. CEP was relevant for access cavity, irrigation, working length and ledge detection training but was no more effective than the REP for evaluating the apical diameter and taper of the root canals, the quality of the fillings, and the presence of perforations and fractured instruments using retro-alveolar radiographs. The conventional evaluation criteria used in preclinical endodontics should be used with care to detect 'unsafe' students.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Collections :
Submission date :
2021-01-20T15:59:25Z
2024-02-15T13:19:59Z
2024-04-03T06:51:31Z
2024-04-24T06:05:02Z
2024-04-26T12:16:22Z
2024-02-15T13:19:59Z
2024-04-03T06:51:31Z
2024-04-24T06:05:02Z
2024-04-26T12:16:22Z
Files
- preclinical_endodontic_training.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Open access
- Access the document