The "French connection": French Scientists ...
Document type :
Autre communication scientifique (congrès sans actes - poster - séminaire...): Communication dans un congrès sans actes
Permalink :
Title :
The "French connection": French Scientists and International Debates on Scientific Property during the Interwar Period
Author(s) :
Conference title :
ISHTIP WORKSHOP 2013 "Cultural Economy and Intellectual Property"
City :
Paris
Country :
France
Start date of the conference :
2013-06-26
Keyword(s) :
History
Intellectual property
Patents
Histoire
Propriété intellectuelle
Science
Brevets
Intellectual property
Patents
Histoire
Propriété intellectuelle
Science
Brevets
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Histoire
French abstract :
L'objet de cette communication est de mettre en regard les débats français et les débats transnationaux sur la propriété scientifique pour évaluer le rôle qu'ont joué les savants français qui y furent engagés. Ces débats ...
Show more >L'objet de cette communication est de mettre en regard les débats français et les débats transnationaux sur la propriété scientifique pour évaluer le rôle qu'ont joué les savants français qui y furent engagés. Ces débats sur la propriété scientifique ne peuvent pas se comprendre isolément, sans qu'il soit fait référence non seulement aux évolutions d'autres domaines de la propriété intellectuelle mais aussi à celles des communautés scientifiques. Pour ces raisons,on reviendra tout d'abord sur l'expérience que constitue la Grande Guerre puis en analysant les débats sur la propriété scientifique en France. Nous évaluons ensuite l'influence française sur les débats internationaux avant d'établir un bilan de cette controverse sur la propriété scientifique.Show less >
Show more >L'objet de cette communication est de mettre en regard les débats français et les débats transnationaux sur la propriété scientifique pour évaluer le rôle qu'ont joué les savants français qui y furent engagés. Ces débats sur la propriété scientifique ne peuvent pas se comprendre isolément, sans qu'il soit fait référence non seulement aux évolutions d'autres domaines de la propriété intellectuelle mais aussi à celles des communautés scientifiques. Pour ces raisons,on reviendra tout d'abord sur l'expérience que constitue la Grande Guerre puis en analysant les débats sur la propriété scientifique en France. Nous évaluons ensuite l'influence française sur les débats internationaux avant d'établir un bilan de cette controverse sur la propriété scientifique.Show less >
English abstract : [en]
Debates on "scientific property" happened during the interwar years. In 1921 the Confederation of Intellectual Workers and the French Union of Inventors proposed a project to improve the protection of scientists' rights ...
Show more >Debates on "scientific property" happened during the interwar years. In 1921 the Confederation of Intellectual Workers and the French Union of Inventors proposed a project to improve the protection of scientists' rights on their discoveries to the International Commission of Intellectual Cooperation (ICIC). A report, published in 1923 by Italian Senator Francesco Ruffini, called for the recognition of specific intellectual property for scientific discovery, in addition to industrial property - which protects the technical invention - and the copyright. Between 1923 and 1927, consultations with governments and the representatives of industry took place and gave rise to a second report written by the French senator and lawyer Marcel Plaisant. Although less ambitious than Ruffini's draft, Plaisant's report was still criticized and received unfavorable opinions from more than two thirds of the forty countries that had given a response. The issue of scientific ownership declined in the early 1930s and it disappeared with the global crisis. In 1946, however, the newly founded UNESCO seized the matter again. Despite the event and the issue's importance, few works have been devoted to this history. Only one conference by Soraya Boudia (2001) and an article by David Miller (2008). Paradoxically, the French reactions are not discussed in detail even though the debate on scientific property began in France and found strong echoes there afterward. Our aim is to illustrate how French scientists were led to claim a proper right on their findings thanks to a strong involvement in transnational institutions. By crossing archives of international organizations (UNESCO and Leage of Nations archives) with national sources we will highlight the international circulation of the concept of scientific property and its adaptation to various national contexts.Show less >
Show more >Debates on "scientific property" happened during the interwar years. In 1921 the Confederation of Intellectual Workers and the French Union of Inventors proposed a project to improve the protection of scientists' rights on their discoveries to the International Commission of Intellectual Cooperation (ICIC). A report, published in 1923 by Italian Senator Francesco Ruffini, called for the recognition of specific intellectual property for scientific discovery, in addition to industrial property - which protects the technical invention - and the copyright. Between 1923 and 1927, consultations with governments and the representatives of industry took place and gave rise to a second report written by the French senator and lawyer Marcel Plaisant. Although less ambitious than Ruffini's draft, Plaisant's report was still criticized and received unfavorable opinions from more than two thirds of the forty countries that had given a response. The issue of scientific ownership declined in the early 1930s and it disappeared with the global crisis. In 1946, however, the newly founded UNESCO seized the matter again. Despite the event and the issue's importance, few works have been devoted to this history. Only one conference by Soraya Boudia (2001) and an article by David Miller (2008). Paradoxically, the French reactions are not discussed in detail even though the debate on scientific property began in France and found strong echoes there afterward. Our aim is to illustrate how French scientists were led to claim a proper right on their findings thanks to a strong involvement in transnational institutions. By crossing archives of international organizations (UNESCO and Leage of Nations archives) with national sources we will highlight the international circulation of the concept of scientific property and its adaptation to various national contexts.Show less >
Language :
Français
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CNRS
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2021-04-02T14:52:40Z