Stepping back from ‘persistence and relapse’ ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Stepping back from ‘persistence and relapse’ to see the forest: Associative interference
Auteur(s) :
Polack, Cody W. [Auteur]
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Miller, Ralph R. [Auteur]
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Miller, Ralph R. [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Behavioural Processes
Nom court de la revue :
Behavioural Processes
Numéro :
141
Pagination :
128-136
Date de publication :
2017-08-01
ISSN :
0376-6357
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Cue interference
Outcome interference
Extinction
Latent inhibition
Relapse
Outcome interference
Extinction
Latent inhibition
Relapse
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Historically, there has been considerable interest in a large variety of forms of associative interference. However, various factors including interest in clinical application and perhaps recent funding priorities have ...
Lire la suite >Historically, there has been considerable interest in a large variety of forms of associative interference. However, various factors including interest in clinical application and perhaps recent funding priorities have resulted in a narrowed focus on one particular instance of interference, extinction, with relative neglect of other types of interference. We have been using the existing literature and conducting new experiments to determine whether there is a consistent set of rules governing the occurrence and persistence of two-phase associative interference across (a) proactive and retroactive interference, (b) cue and outcome interference, (c) the type of training in phase 1 (excitatory, inhibitory, or simple nonreinforcement), and (d) the type of training in phase 2 (excitatory, inhibitory, or simple nonreinforcement). Our hope is that a return to more general questions concerning associative interference might reveal broad truths concerning the nature of forgetting. Identifying global principles of associative interference may also help us better appreciate the nature of extinction, including how it can be enhanced and made more enduring, as well as how it can be minimized and made more fleeting.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Historically, there has been considerable interest in a large variety of forms of associative interference. However, various factors including interest in clinical application and perhaps recent funding priorities have resulted in a narrowed focus on one particular instance of interference, extinction, with relative neglect of other types of interference. We have been using the existing literature and conducting new experiments to determine whether there is a consistent set of rules governing the occurrence and persistence of two-phase associative interference across (a) proactive and retroactive interference, (b) cue and outcome interference, (c) the type of training in phase 1 (excitatory, inhibitory, or simple nonreinforcement), and (d) the type of training in phase 2 (excitatory, inhibitory, or simple nonreinforcement). Our hope is that a return to more general questions concerning associative interference might reveal broad truths concerning the nature of forgetting. Identifying global principles of associative interference may also help us better appreciate the nature of extinction, including how it can be enhanced and made more enduring, as well as how it can be minimized and made more fleeting.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Équipe Action, Vision et Apprentissage (AVA)
Date de dépôt :
2019-02-13T14:18:00Z
2020-04-15T10:03:47Z
2020-04-15T10:03:47Z