A decontamination process adding a ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
A decontamination process adding a tensioactive agent and isopropanol to a closed-system drug transfer device for better control of isolator contamination. A prospective, parallel study.
Author(s) :
Vasseur, Michele [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Simon, Nicolas [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Picher, Chloe [Auteur]
Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Richeval, Camille [Auteur]
Toxicologie et Génopathies [CHRU Lille]
Soichot, Marion [Auteur]
Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Humbert, Luc [Auteur]
Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Barthelemy, Christine [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Fleury-Souverain, Sandrine [Auteur]
Bonnabry, Pascal [Auteur]
Décaudin, Bertrand [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Allorge, Delphine [Auteur]
Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Odou, Pascal [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Simon, Nicolas [Auteur]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Picher, Chloe [Auteur]
Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Richeval, Camille [Auteur]
Toxicologie et Génopathies [CHRU Lille]
Soichot, Marion [Auteur]
Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Humbert, Luc [Auteur]
Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Barthelemy, Christine [Auteur]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Fleury-Souverain, Sandrine [Auteur]
Bonnabry, Pascal [Auteur]
Décaudin, Bertrand [Auteur]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Allorge, Delphine [Auteur]

Impact de l'environnement chimique sur la santé humaine - ULR 4483 [IMPECS]
Odou, Pascal [Auteur]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Journal title :
PLoS One
Abbreviated title :
PLoS One
Volume number :
13
Pages :
e0201335
Publication date :
2018
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
BACKGROUND: Despite the use of closed system drug transfer devices (CSTD), residual contamination from antineoplastic drugs is still detected inside isolators. The aim of this study was to compare the decontamination level ...
Show more >BACKGROUND: Despite the use of closed system drug transfer devices (CSTD), residual contamination from antineoplastic drugs is still detected inside isolators. The aim of this study was to compare the decontamination level obtained using a CSTD + standard cleaning procedure with a CSTD + standard cleaning procedure + specific decontamination procedure. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A comparative and prospective study was carried out in a newly opened compounding unit. Compounding was performed with a CSTD (BD-Phaseal, Becton-Dickinson). In the Control isolator (C), the cleaning process was completed daily with a standard biocide solution (AnioxysprayTM, Anios, France). In the Intervention isolator (I), weekly decontamination with a homemade admixture of sodium dodecyl sulfate 10-2 M/70% isopropanol (80/20, v/v) was added. Monitoring was performed via a validated LC-MS/MS method. Eight drugs (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, fluorouracile, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, irinotecan and methotrexate) were monitored daily over 14 consecutive weeks on three sites inside the isolators: gloves, workbench and window. Results are presented as the odds-ratio (OR) of contamination and as overall decontamination efficiency (EffQ, %). The proportion of EffQ ≥ 90% was assessed by a Fisher's exact test (p<0.05). Overall contamination rates (CR, %) were significantly different from one isolator to the other (CRC = 25.3% vs. CRI = 10.4%; OR = 0.341; p<0.0001). Overall EffQ values (median; 1st and 3rd quartiles) were higher in the intervention isolator (I: 78.3% [34.6%;92.6%] vs. C: 59.5% [-5.5%;72.6%]; p = 0.0015) as well as the proportion of days with an EffQ ≥ 90% (I: 42.9% vs. C: 7.1%; p = 0.077) but very variable depending on drugs. CONCLUSION: Adding a decontamination protocol with a tensioactive agent to a CSTD leads to better control of chemical contamination inside isolators. Improving decontamination by increasing decontamination frequency or modifying the protocol will be further studied.Show less >
Show more >BACKGROUND: Despite the use of closed system drug transfer devices (CSTD), residual contamination from antineoplastic drugs is still detected inside isolators. The aim of this study was to compare the decontamination level obtained using a CSTD + standard cleaning procedure with a CSTD + standard cleaning procedure + specific decontamination procedure. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A comparative and prospective study was carried out in a newly opened compounding unit. Compounding was performed with a CSTD (BD-Phaseal, Becton-Dickinson). In the Control isolator (C), the cleaning process was completed daily with a standard biocide solution (AnioxysprayTM, Anios, France). In the Intervention isolator (I), weekly decontamination with a homemade admixture of sodium dodecyl sulfate 10-2 M/70% isopropanol (80/20, v/v) was added. Monitoring was performed via a validated LC-MS/MS method. Eight drugs (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, fluorouracile, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, irinotecan and methotrexate) were monitored daily over 14 consecutive weeks on three sites inside the isolators: gloves, workbench and window. Results are presented as the odds-ratio (OR) of contamination and as overall decontamination efficiency (EffQ, %). The proportion of EffQ ≥ 90% was assessed by a Fisher's exact test (p<0.05). Overall contamination rates (CR, %) were significantly different from one isolator to the other (CRC = 25.3% vs. CRI = 10.4%; OR = 0.341; p<0.0001). Overall EffQ values (median; 1st and 3rd quartiles) were higher in the intervention isolator (I: 78.3% [34.6%;92.6%] vs. C: 59.5% [-5.5%;72.6%]; p = 0.0015) as well as the proportion of days with an EffQ ≥ 90% (I: 42.9% vs. C: 7.1%; p = 0.077) but very variable depending on drugs. CONCLUSION: Adding a decontamination protocol with a tensioactive agent to a CSTD leads to better control of chemical contamination inside isolators. Improving decontamination by increasing decontamination frequency or modifying the protocol will be further studied.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CHU Lille
Institut Pasteur de Lille
CHU Lille
Institut Pasteur de Lille
Collections :
Research team(s) :
Innovation/évaluation des médicaments injectables
Modélisation biopharmaceutique et pharmacocinétique
Innovation/évaluation des dispositifs médicaux de perfusion
Modélisation biopharmaceutique et pharmacocinétique
Innovation/évaluation des dispositifs médicaux de perfusion
Submission date :
2019-02-26T17:06:52Z
2019-07-05T12:01:09Z
2021-06-07T09:51:51Z
2019-07-05T12:01:09Z
2021-06-07T09:51:51Z
Files
- 7472c64007f806fe3ccc93abf0f3992e9e5d.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Open access
- Access the document