A combined RHEED and photoemission comparison ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
Title :
A combined RHEED and photoemission comparison of the GaP and InP (001) (2x4) surface reconstructions
Author(s) :
Wallart, X. [Auteur]
Institut d’Électronique, de Microélectronique et de Nanotechnologie - UMR 8520 [IEMN]
Institut d’Électronique, de Microélectronique et de Nanotechnologie - UMR 8520 [IEMN]
Journal title :
Surface Science : A Journal Devoted to the Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces
Pages :
203-212
Publisher :
Elsevier
Publication date :
2002
ISSN :
0039-6028
English keyword(s) :
Gallium phosphide
Indium phosphide
Molecular beam epitaxy
Reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED)
Surface relaxation and reconstruction
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Indium phosphide
Molecular beam epitaxy
Reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED)
Surface relaxation and reconstruction
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'ingénieur [physics]
English abstract : [en]
In this work, we compare the (2×4) reconstructions of GaP and InP(0 0 1) surfaces. Two different (2×4) reconstructions are detected by reflection high energy electron diffraction for both materials. Photoemission experiments ...
Show more >In this work, we compare the (2×4) reconstructions of GaP and InP(0 0 1) surfaces. Two different (2×4) reconstructions are detected by reflection high energy electron diffraction for both materials. Photoemission experiments reveal that the high temperature one is cation-rich whereas the low temperature one is anion-rich. High resolution spectra on the high temperature (2×4) reconstructions exhibit surface components which are in agreement with what is expected from the mixed-dimer model in both cases. As regards the low temperature (2×4) GaP, a second surface component on the P 2p core level line reveals that two different atomic sites exist for the P-atoms at the surface which is different from the β2 (2×4) geometry. The low temperature (2×4) InP is more phosphorus-rich and turns to be a mixture between the (2×1) and the high temperature (2×4) reconstructions.Show less >
Show more >In this work, we compare the (2×4) reconstructions of GaP and InP(0 0 1) surfaces. Two different (2×4) reconstructions are detected by reflection high energy electron diffraction for both materials. Photoemission experiments reveal that the high temperature one is cation-rich whereas the low temperature one is anion-rich. High resolution spectra on the high temperature (2×4) reconstructions exhibit surface components which are in agreement with what is expected from the mixed-dimer model in both cases. As regards the low temperature (2×4) GaP, a second surface component on the P 2p core level line reveals that two different atomic sites exist for the P-atoms at the surface which is different from the β2 (2×4) geometry. The low temperature (2×4) InP is more phosphorus-rich and turns to be a mixture between the (2×1) and the high temperature (2×4) reconstructions.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Popular science :
Non
Source :