Relationship between run times to exhaustion ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Relationship between run times to exhaustion at 90, 100, 120, and 140% of vVO2max and velocity expressed relatively to critical velocity and maximal velocity.
Auteur(s) :
Blondel, Nicolas [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Billat, V [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Lensel, G [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Lensel [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Billat, V [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Lensel, G [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Lensel [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Nom court de la revue :
Int J Sports Med
Numéro :
22
Pagination :
27-33
Date de publication :
2001-01-01
ISSN :
0172-4622
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Adult
Anaerobic Threshold
Fatigue
Forecasting
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Oxygen Consumption
Running
Anaerobic Threshold
Fatigue
Forecasting
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Oxygen Consumption
Running
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Médecine humaine et pathologie/Physiologie [q-bio.TO]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
The aim of the present study was to explain the inter-individual variability in running time to exhaustion (tlim) when running speed was expressed as a percentage of the velocity, associated with maximal oxygen uptake ...
Lire la suite >The aim of the present study was to explain the inter-individual variability in running time to exhaustion (tlim) when running speed was expressed as a percentage of the velocity, associated with maximal oxygen uptake (vVO2max). Indeed for the same percentage of vVO2max the anaerobic contribution to energy supply is different and could be dependent on the critical velocity (Cv) and also on the maximal running velocity (vmax). Ten subjects ran four tlim at 90, 100, 120, and 140% of vVO2max; mean and standard deviation for tlim were 839 +/- 236 s, 357 +/- 110 s, 122 +/- 27 s, and 65 +/- 17s, respectively. Each velocity was then expressed 1) as a percentage of the difference between vVO2max and Cv (%AeSR); 2) as a percentage of the difference between vmax and Cv (%MSR); 3) as a percentage of the difference between vmax and vVO2max (%AnSR). Highest correlations were found between tlim90 and tlim100 and velocity expressed as %MSR (r = -0.82, p < 0.01 and r = -0.75, p < 0.01), and between tlim120 and tlim140 and velocity expressed as %AnSR (r = -0.83, p < 0.01 and r = -0.94, p < 0.001). These results show that the same intensity relative to aerobic contribution did not represent the same absolute intensity for all and could partly explain variability in tlim. Therefore expressing intensity as a percentage of MSR for sub-maximal and maximal velocities and as a percentage of AnSR for supra-maximal velocities allows individual differences in anaerobic work capacity to be taken into account and running times to exhaustion to be predicted accurately.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >The aim of the present study was to explain the inter-individual variability in running time to exhaustion (tlim) when running speed was expressed as a percentage of the velocity, associated with maximal oxygen uptake (vVO2max). Indeed for the same percentage of vVO2max the anaerobic contribution to energy supply is different and could be dependent on the critical velocity (Cv) and also on the maximal running velocity (vmax). Ten subjects ran four tlim at 90, 100, 120, and 140% of vVO2max; mean and standard deviation for tlim were 839 +/- 236 s, 357 +/- 110 s, 122 +/- 27 s, and 65 +/- 17s, respectively. Each velocity was then expressed 1) as a percentage of the difference between vVO2max and Cv (%AeSR); 2) as a percentage of the difference between vmax and Cv (%MSR); 3) as a percentage of the difference between vmax and vVO2max (%AnSR). Highest correlations were found between tlim90 and tlim100 and velocity expressed as %MSR (r = -0.82, p < 0.01 and r = -0.75, p < 0.01), and between tlim120 and tlim140 and velocity expressed as %AnSR (r = -0.83, p < 0.01 and r = -0.94, p < 0.001). These results show that the same intensity relative to aerobic contribution did not represent the same absolute intensity for all and could partly explain variability in tlim. Therefore expressing intensity as a percentage of MSR for sub-maximal and maximal velocities and as a percentage of AnSR for supra-maximal velocities allows individual differences in anaerobic work capacity to be taken into account and running times to exhaustion to be predicted accurately.Lire moins >
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Univ. Artois
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Univ. Artois
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2021-11-11T16:22:51Z
2021-11-18T16:31:08Z
2021-11-18T16:31:08Z
Fichiers
- 2001_Blondel_IJSM.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document