Performance for short intermittent runs: active recovery vs. passive recovery.

Dupont, Gregory; Blondel, Nicolas; Berthoin, Serge

Document type :

Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original

DOI :

10.1007/s00421-003-0834-2

PMID :

12734760

Permalink :

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/56105

Title :

Performance for short intermittent runs: active recovery vs. passive recovery.

Author(s) :

Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]

Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369
Blondel, Nicolas [Auteur]

Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]

Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369

Journal title :

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abbreviated title :

Eur J Appl Physiol

Volume number :

Pages :

548-54

Publication date :

2003-08-01

ISSN :

1439-6319

English keyword(s) :

Adult
Hemoglobins
Humans
Lactic Acid
Male
Myoglobin
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Endurance
Running

HAL domain(s) :

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

English abstract : [en]

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of active vs. passive recovery on the time to exhaustion for intermittent runs (15 s) at supramaximal velocity (120% of maximal aerobic speed). Twelve male subjects ...
Show more >The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of active vs. passive recovery on the time to exhaustion for intermittent runs (15 s) at supramaximal velocity (120% of maximal aerobic speed). Twelve male subjects performed a graded test, an intermittent run to exhaustion with active recovery (50% of maximal aerobic speed) and an intermittent run to exhaustion with passive recovery. Results showed that intermittent runs to exhaustion with passive recovery [745 (171) s] allowed subjects to run for a significantly longer (p<0.001) time than intermittent runs to exhaustion with active recovery [445 (79) s]. These results could be explained by a significantly higher (p<0.001) energy requirement for intermittent runs with active recovery [59.9 (9.6) ml.kg(-1).min(-1)] than for intermittent runs with passive recovery [48.9 (6.9) ml.kg(-1).min(-1)]. It could be also hypothesized that the energy required to run during short active recovery would result in less oxygen being available to reload myoglobin and haemoglobin, to remove lactate concentrations and to resynthesize the phosphocreatine. Consequently, for intermittent runs with short recovery periods, passive recovery will induce a longer time to exhaustion than active recovery.Show less >

Language :

Anglais

Peer reviewed article :

Oui

Audience :

Non spécifiée

Popular science :

Oui

Administrative institution(s) :

Université de Lille
Univ. Artois
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale

Collections :

Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369

Research team(s) :

Activité Physique, Muscle, Santé (APMS)

Submission date :

2021-11-11T19:41:18Z
2021-12-01T08:10:41Z

Files

2003_Dupont_EJAP.pdf
Version éditeur
Confidential access
Access the document

Version	Link	Modification date
2	20.500.12210/56105*	2021-12-01T08:08:04Z
1	20.500.12210/56105.1	2021-11-11T19:41:18Z

Performance for short intermittent runs: ...

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS

Files

Version history

Performance for short intermittent runs: ... BibTeX CSV Excel RIS

Files

Version history

Performance for short intermittent runs: ...

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS