Associative versus predictive processes ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Associative versus predictive processes in Pavlovian conditioning
Auteur(s) :
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]

Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Titre de la revue :
Behavioural Processes
Nom court de la revue :
Behavioural Processes
Numéro :
154
Pagination :
21-26
Date de publication :
2017-12-20
ISSN :
0376-6357
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Learning
memory
conditioning
Rescorla-Wagner model
association
prediction
memory
conditioning
Rescorla-Wagner model
association
prediction
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Learning and memory are so obviously related that it is hard to see how the understanding of one could proceed without an understanding of the other. Yet, in psychology, they are studied by two different research communities. ...
Lire la suite >Learning and memory are so obviously related that it is hard to see how the understanding of one could proceed without an understanding of the other. Yet, in psychology, they are studied by two different research communities. The concept of association, which is central both to the field of conditioning and to that of retrieval and forgetting, could be used to bridge the gap between the two concepts. However, the concept is quite different in the fields of learning and memory, a situation for which this article argues that the Rescorla-Wagner model is mainly to blame. By viewing Pavlovian conditioning as the outcome of a predictive process but using the traditional associative language developed in memory studies to describe this process, it has introduced an unnecessary confusion between memory and prediction within the field of learning. This confusion needs to be acknowledged so that the concepts of associations and predictions can again be differentiated. This would allow for better integration of the fields of learning and memory.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Learning and memory are so obviously related that it is hard to see how the understanding of one could proceed without an understanding of the other. Yet, in psychology, they are studied by two different research communities. The concept of association, which is central both to the field of conditioning and to that of retrieval and forgetting, could be used to bridge the gap between the two concepts. However, the concept is quite different in the fields of learning and memory, a situation for which this article argues that the Rescorla-Wagner model is mainly to blame. By viewing Pavlovian conditioning as the outcome of a predictive process but using the traditional associative language developed in memory studies to describe this process, it has introduced an unnecessary confusion between memory and prediction within the field of learning. This confusion needs to be acknowledged so that the concepts of associations and predictions can again be differentiated. This would allow for better integration of the fields of learning and memory.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Équipe Action, Vision et Apprentissage (AVA)
Date de dépôt :
2019-03-11T11:34:35Z
2019-11-21T07:45:29Z
2021-01-07T11:13:56Z
2023-03-29T08:59:00Z
2019-11-21T07:45:29Z
2021-01-07T11:13:56Z
2023-03-29T08:59:00Z
Fichiers
- BPManuscriptMemory.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document