Grapheme coding in L2: How do L2 learners ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
Permalink :
Title :
Grapheme coding in L2: How do L2 learners process new graphemes?
Author(s) :
Commissaire, Eva [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche en Sciences Cognitives et Affectives [URECA]
Duncan, Lynne G. [Auteur]
University of Dundee
Casalis, Severine [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche en Sciences Cognitives et Affectives [URECA]
Unité de Recherche en Sciences Cognitives et Affectives [URECA]
Duncan, Lynne G. [Auteur]
University of Dundee
Casalis, Severine [Auteur]

Unité de Recherche en Sciences Cognitives et Affectives [URECA]
Journal title :
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Abbreviated title :
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume number :
26
Pages :
725-739
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited
Publication date :
2014-09-09
ISSN :
2044-592X
English keyword(s) :
Grapheme
Second language
Sub-lexical processing
Visual word recognition
Second language
Sub-lexical processing
Visual word recognition
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Grapheme coding was examined in French Grade 6 and Grade 8 children and adults who learned English as a second language (L2). In Experiments 1 and 2, three conditions were compared in a letter detection task in L2: (1) ...
Show more >Grapheme coding was examined in French Grade 6 and Grade 8 children and adults who learned English as a second language (L2). In Experiments 1 and 2, three conditions were compared in a letter detection task in L2: (1) simple grapheme (i.e., detect “a” in black); (2) complex language-shared grapheme (i.e., “a” in brain) and (3) complex L2-specific grapheme (i.e., “a” in beach). The data indicated that graphemes in L2 words were functional sub-lexical orthographic units for these L2 learners. Moreover, L2-specific graphemes took longer to process than language-shared complex graphemes. Using the same task, Experiment 3 examined phonological influences by manipulating the cross-language congruency of grapheme-to-phoneme mappings (detect “a” in have [congruent] vs. take [incongruent]). The outcome of this study offers preliminary evidence of graphemic coding during L2 word recognition both at the orthographic and the orthography-to-phonology mapping levels.Show less >
Show more >Grapheme coding was examined in French Grade 6 and Grade 8 children and adults who learned English as a second language (L2). In Experiments 1 and 2, three conditions were compared in a letter detection task in L2: (1) simple grapheme (i.e., detect “a” in black); (2) complex language-shared grapheme (i.e., “a” in brain) and (3) complex L2-specific grapheme (i.e., “a” in beach). The data indicated that graphemes in L2 words were functional sub-lexical orthographic units for these L2 learners. Moreover, L2-specific graphemes took longer to process than language-shared complex graphemes. Using the same task, Experiment 3 examined phonological influences by manipulating the cross-language congruency of grapheme-to-phoneme mappings (detect “a” in have [congruent] vs. take [incongruent]). The outcome of this study offers preliminary evidence of graphemic coding during L2 word recognition both at the orthographic and the orthography-to-phonology mapping levels.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Collections :
Research team(s) :
Équipe Langage
Submission date :
2022-02-17T07:14:03Z
2022-03-11T10:09:54Z
2022-03-11T10:09:54Z
Files
- Commissaire Duncan Casalis 2014.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Open access
- Access the document