New public management and professionals ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
URL permanente :
Titre :
New public management and professionals in the public sector
Auteur(s) :
Bezes, Philippe [Auteur]
Demazière, Didier [Auteur]
Le Bianic, Thomas [Auteur]
Paradeise, Catherine [Auteur]
Normand, Romuald [Auteur]
Benamouzig, Daniel [Auteur]
Pierru, Frédéric [Auteur]
Centre d'Études et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales (CERAPS) - UMR 8026
Centre universitaire de recherches sur l'action publique et le politique. Epistémologie et Sciences sociales [CURAPP-ESS]
Evetts, Julia [Auteur]
Demazière, Didier [Auteur]
Le Bianic, Thomas [Auteur]
Paradeise, Catherine [Auteur]
Normand, Romuald [Auteur]
Benamouzig, Daniel [Auteur]
Pierru, Frédéric [Auteur]
Centre d'Études et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales (CERAPS) - UMR 8026
Centre universitaire de recherches sur l'action publique et le politique. Epistémologie et Sciences sociales [CURAPP-ESS]
Evetts, Julia [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Sociologie du travail
Numéro :
54
Pagination :
e1-e52
Éditeur :
Association pour le développement de la sociologie du travail
Date de publication :
2012-10
ISSN :
0038-0296
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
France
Professionalism
Professional bureaucracies
New public management
Professional groups
Professions
Occupational autonomy
Reform of the public administration
Professionalism
Professional bureaucracies
New public management
Professional groups
Professions
Occupational autonomy
Reform of the public administration
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Sociologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
The proliferation of reforms in public administration based on the principles and instruments of the " New Public Management" (NPM) have triggered protest from and collective action by many professional groups in various ...
Lire la suite >The proliferation of reforms in public administration based on the principles and instruments of the " New Public Management" (NPM) have triggered protest from and collective action by many professional groups in various sectors (healthcare, education, justice, social work, research...) and raised questions about the future of professionals working in the public service, particularly as concerns their autonomy. However, after analyzing the situation, it seems that the opposition between NPM and certain professional groups is not the last word in the debate. Should changes be seen as the decline of professional groups and of their autonomy or as a transformation of professional models, an overhaul of professionalism, etc.? Such questions, which current events in France and Europe have brought to the fore, are food for ongoing sociological thought. They are broached here empirically, from the field, applying varied levels of analysis and research. The contributors to this dossier explore the different forms of tension existing between professional groups and NPM. © 2012 Elsevier MassonLire moins >
Lire la suite >The proliferation of reforms in public administration based on the principles and instruments of the " New Public Management" (NPM) have triggered protest from and collective action by many professional groups in various sectors (healthcare, education, justice, social work, research...) and raised questions about the future of professionals working in the public service, particularly as concerns their autonomy. However, after analyzing the situation, it seems that the opposition between NPM and certain professional groups is not the last word in the debate. Should changes be seen as the decline of professional groups and of their autonomy or as a transformation of professional models, an overhaul of professionalism, etc.? Such questions, which current events in France and Europe have brought to the fore, are food for ongoing sociological thought. They are broached here empirically, from the field, applying varied levels of analysis and research. The contributors to this dossier explore the different forms of tension existing between professional groups and NPM. © 2012 Elsevier MassonLire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
CNRS
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2022-03-23T17:19:41Z
2022-04-01T16:50:28Z
2022-04-01T16:50:28Z
Fichiers
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document