• English
    • français
  • Help
  •  | 
  • Contact
  •  | 
  • About
  •  | 
  • Login
  • HAL portal
  •  | 
  • Pages Pro
  • EN
  •  / 
  • FR
View Item 
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Centre d'Études en Civilisations Langues et Lettres Étrangères (CECILLE) - ULR 4074
  • View Item
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • Centre d'Études en Civilisations Langues et Lettres Étrangères (CECILLE) - ULR 4074
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

De quoi le Cusain et le Nolain sont-ils le nom ?
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • Excel
  • RIS

Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
Title :
De quoi le Cusain et le Nolain sont-ils le nom ?
Author(s) :
Salza, Luca [Auteur] refId
Centre d'Études en Civilisations, Langues et Lettres Étrangères - ULR 4074 [CECILLE]
Journal title :
Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale
Blumenberg: Les origines de la modernité
Pages :
53 - 64
Publisher :
Presses Universitaires de France
Publication date :
2012
ISSN :
0035-1571
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Philosophie
English abstract : [en]
The relation between Nicholas of Kues and Giordano Bruno deals with the old question about the beginning of modernity. According to Blumenberg, they belong to the same historical age, they make the same kind of questions ...
Show more >
The relation between Nicholas of Kues and Giordano Bruno deals with the old question about the beginning of modernity. According to Blumenberg, they belong to the same historical age, they make the same kind of questions and they try to answer to the same kind of problems. Nonetheless, they seem to give very different answers. Even if something must have happened, and a threshold has probably been crossed, there is an invisible limit rather than a breaking off of the epoch. With the notion of “threshold”, then, Blumenberg gives us the image of the possible coexistence of two different epochs. In this way, Nicholas of Kues and Giordano Bruno become themselves the symbol of the impossibility of conceiving history in terms of “epochs” and, consequently, of interpreting modernity in this way.Show less >
Language :
Français
Peer reviewed article :
Non
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
  • Centre d'Études en Civilisations Langues et Lettres Étrangères (CECILLE) - ULR 4074
Source :
Harvested from HAL
Université de Lille

Mentions légales
Université de Lille © 2017