Outcomes of preventive embolization of the ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Outcomes of preventive embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery during evar
Author(s) :
Petit, Pierre [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Hertault, Adrien [Auteur]
Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS]
Mesnard, Thomas [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Bianchini, Aurelia [Auteur]
Centre hospitalier [Valenciennes, Nord]
Lopez, Benjamin [Auteur]
Patterson, Benjamin Oliver [Auteur]
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Haulon, Stephan [Auteur]
Pôle des Cardiopathies Congénitales du Nouveau-Né à L'adulte - Centre Constitutif Cardiopathies Congénitales Complexes M3C, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Hôpital Marie-Lannelongue, Inserm U999, Université Paris-Saclay
Sobocinski, Jonathan [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Hertault, Adrien [Auteur]
Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS]
Mesnard, Thomas [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Bianchini, Aurelia [Auteur]
Centre hospitalier [Valenciennes, Nord]
Lopez, Benjamin [Auteur]
Patterson, Benjamin Oliver [Auteur]
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Haulon, Stephan [Auteur]
Pôle des Cardiopathies Congénitales du Nouveau-Né à L'adulte - Centre Constitutif Cardiopathies Congénitales Complexes M3C, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Hôpital Marie-Lannelongue, Inserm U999, Université Paris-Saclay
Sobocinski, Jonathan [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Médicaments et biomatériaux à libération contrôlée: mécanismes et optimisation - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems - U 1008 [MBLC - ADDS]
Journal title :
JVIR: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Abbreviated title :
J Vasc Interv Radiol
Volume number :
32
Pages :
1360-1370
Publication date :
2021-06-01
ISSN :
1535-7732
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
To evaluate the impact of preemptive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR).
From January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing elective ...
Show more >To evaluate the impact of preemptive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR). From January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing elective EVAR or fenestrated EVAR (F-EVAR) for asymptomatic AAA in a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. Three groups of patients were defined: patients with a patent IMA who underwent embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 1), those with a patent IMA who did not undergo embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 2), and those with a chronically occluded IMA (group 3). Preoperative aortic morphology, demographics, and procedural details were recorded. Aneurysmal growth (≥5 mm), reintervention, and overall mortality rates were analyzed using multivariate proportional hazard multivariate modeling. Propensity scores were constructed, and inverse probability weighting was applied to a new set of multivariate analyses to perform a sensitivity analysis. A total of 266 patients (male, 95% [n = 249]) with a median age of 70 (65-77) years were included, with F-EVAR procedures comprising 87 (32.7%) of the interventions. There were 52, 142, and 72 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Changes in aneurysmal sac size did not differ between groups, nor did overall survival or reintervention rates at 24 months. IMA embolization was not identified as an independently protective factor for aneurysmal growth during follow-up (relative risk [RR] = 2.82/mm [0.96-8.28], P = .060), whereas accessory renal arteries (RR = 5.07/mm [1.72-14.96], P = .003) and a larger preoperative aneurysmal diameter (RR = 1.09/mm [1.03-1.15], P = .004) were independent risk factors for sac enlargement. Preventive embolization of the IMA during EVAR or F-EVAR did not promote aneurysmal sac shrinking or decrease the reintervention rate at 2-year follow-up.Show less >
Show more >To evaluate the impact of preemptive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR). From January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing elective EVAR or fenestrated EVAR (F-EVAR) for asymptomatic AAA in a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. Three groups of patients were defined: patients with a patent IMA who underwent embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 1), those with a patent IMA who did not undergo embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 2), and those with a chronically occluded IMA (group 3). Preoperative aortic morphology, demographics, and procedural details were recorded. Aneurysmal growth (≥5 mm), reintervention, and overall mortality rates were analyzed using multivariate proportional hazard multivariate modeling. Propensity scores were constructed, and inverse probability weighting was applied to a new set of multivariate analyses to perform a sensitivity analysis. A total of 266 patients (male, 95% [n = 249]) with a median age of 70 (65-77) years were included, with F-EVAR procedures comprising 87 (32.7%) of the interventions. There were 52, 142, and 72 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Changes in aneurysmal sac size did not differ between groups, nor did overall survival or reintervention rates at 24 months. IMA embolization was not identified as an independently protective factor for aneurysmal growth during follow-up (relative risk [RR] = 2.82/mm [0.96-8.28], P = .060), whereas accessory renal arteries (RR = 5.07/mm [1.72-14.96], P = .003) and a larger preoperative aneurysmal diameter (RR = 1.09/mm [1.03-1.15], P = .004) were independent risk factors for sac enlargement. Preventive embolization of the IMA during EVAR or F-EVAR did not promote aneurysmal sac shrinking or decrease the reintervention rate at 2-year follow-up.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Collections :
Research team(s) :
U1008
Submission date :
2022-04-13T07:12:05Z
2024-02-19T15:18:36Z
2024-02-19T15:18:36Z