Surgical training 2. 0: a systematic ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Surgical training 2. 0: a systematic approach reviewing the literature focusing on oral maxillofacial surgery - part i
Author(s) :
Grall, Patrick [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Ferri, Joel [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Nicot, Romain [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Ferri, Joel [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Nicot, Romain [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Journal title :
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abbreviated title :
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg
Volume number :
122
Pages :
411-422
Publication date :
2021-01-29
ISSN :
2468-7855
English keyword(s) :
Surgery Education
Open field camera
3-Dimensional printing
Maxillofacial surgery
Telemedicine
Open field camera
3-Dimensional printing
Maxillofacial surgery
Telemedicine
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Many technologies are emerging in the medical field. Having an overview of the technological arsenal available to train new surgeons seems very interesting to guide subsequent surgical training protocols.
This article is ...
Show more >Many technologies are emerging in the medical field. Having an overview of the technological arsenal available to train new surgeons seems very interesting to guide subsequent surgical training protocols. This article is a systematic approach reviewing new technologies in surgical training, in particular in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This review explores what new technologies can do compared to traditional methods in the field of surgical education. A structured literature search of PubMed was performed in adherence to PRISMA guidelines. The articles were selected when they fell within predefined inclusion criteria while respecting the key objectives of this systematic review. We looked at medical students and more specifically in surgery and analysed whether exposure to new technologies improved their surgical skills compared to traditional methods. Each technology is reviewed by highlighting its advantages and disadvantages and studying the feasibility of integration into current practice. The results are encouraging. Indeed, all of these technologies make it possible to reduce the learning time, the operating times, the operating complications and increase the enthusiasm of the students compared to more conventional methods. The start-up cost, the complexity to develop new models, and the openness of mind necessary for the integration of these technologies are all obstacles to immediate development. The main limitations of this review are that many of the studies have been carried out on small numbers, they are not interested in acquiring knowledge or skills over the long term and obviously there is a publication bias. Surgical education methods will probably change in the years to come, integrating these new technologies into the curriculum seems essential so as not to remain on the side. This first part therefore reviews, open field camera, telemedicine and 3D printing. This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO.Show less >
Show more >Many technologies are emerging in the medical field. Having an overview of the technological arsenal available to train new surgeons seems very interesting to guide subsequent surgical training protocols. This article is a systematic approach reviewing new technologies in surgical training, in particular in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This review explores what new technologies can do compared to traditional methods in the field of surgical education. A structured literature search of PubMed was performed in adherence to PRISMA guidelines. The articles were selected when they fell within predefined inclusion criteria while respecting the key objectives of this systematic review. We looked at medical students and more specifically in surgery and analysed whether exposure to new technologies improved their surgical skills compared to traditional methods. Each technology is reviewed by highlighting its advantages and disadvantages and studying the feasibility of integration into current practice. The results are encouraging. Indeed, all of these technologies make it possible to reduce the learning time, the operating times, the operating complications and increase the enthusiasm of the students compared to more conventional methods. The start-up cost, the complexity to develop new models, and the openness of mind necessary for the integration of these technologies are all obstacles to immediate development. The main limitations of this review are that many of the studies have been carried out on small numbers, they are not interested in acquiring knowledge or skills over the long term and obviously there is a publication bias. Surgical education methods will probably change in the years to come, integrating these new technologies into the curriculum seems essential so as not to remain on the side. This first part therefore reviews, open field camera, telemedicine and 3D printing. This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Collections :
Research team(s) :
U1008
Submission date :
2022-04-13T07:12:13Z
2024-02-16T10:49:49Z
2024-02-16T10:49:49Z