Title :

Judgment of blame in teenagers with Asperger's syndrome

Author(s) :

Salvano-Pardieu, Véronique [Auteur]
Équipe de Recherche Contextes et Acteurs de l'Éducation [ERCAE]
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]
Blanc, Romuald [Auteur]
Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé [LPPS - EA 4057]
Combalbert, Nicolas [Auteur]
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]
Pierratte, Aurélia [Auteur]
Manktelow, Ken [Auteur]
Maintier, Christine [Auteur]
Lepeltier, Sandra [Auteur]
Gimenes, Guillaume [Auteur]
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]
Barthelemy, Catherine [Auteur]
Imagerie et cerveau [iBrain - Inserm U1253 - UNIV Tours ]
Fontaine, Roger [Auteur]
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]

Journal title :

Thinking & Reasoning

Volume number :

22

Pages :

251-273

Publisher :

Informa UK Limited

Publication date :

2016-12-28

English keyword(s) :

Judgment of blame
teenagers
Asperger’s syndrome
cognitive development

HAL domain(s) :

Sciences cognitives

English abstract : [en]

The judgment of blame was studied in a group of 28 teenagers, 14 with Asperger syndrome (AS) and 14 typically developed. Teenagers in each group were matched by age, cognitive development and academic level. They were ...
Show more >The judgment of blame was studied in a group of 28 teenagers, 14 with Asperger syndrome (AS) and 14 typically developed. Teenagers in each group were matched by age, cognitive development and academic level. They were presented with 12 short vignettes in which they had to judge an action according to the intent of the actor (deliberate and accidental), the consequences of the action (presence and absence) and the seriousness of the situation (low, medium and high). Results showed a significant difference in the patterns of judgment of both groups. The AS group judged the action according to the physical consequence of the action more than the intent of the actor; the opposite was observed with the control group. In addition, the AS teenagers were less capable than the control group of grading injury to a person when apportioning blame especially when they were not familiar with the social situations. This result suggests that the judgement of the seriousness of the outcome of the social interaction is linked with its level of familiarity. Furthermore, result are congruent with the assumption that two different cognitive structures, deontic reasoning and perspective taking, are involved in the judgment of blame.Show less >

Language :

Anglais

Peer reviewed article :

Oui

Audience :

Internationale

Popular science :

Non

Administrative institution(s) :

Université de Lille

Collections :

• Autres travaux scientifiques

Research team(s) :

Education & Société

Submission date :

2022-05-16T16:23:59Z
2022-05-24T13:29:36Z