Global Supply Chain Sustainability: the ...
Document type :
Partie d'ouvrage
Title :
Global Supply Chain Sustainability: the Role of Non-governmental Enforcement Mechanisms
Author(s) :
Limardi, Michela [Auteur]
Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Management et Économie Lab - ULR 7396 [RIME-Lab]
Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne [CES]
Battista, Francesca [Auteur]
Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Management et Économie Lab - ULR 7396 [RIME-Lab]
Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne [CES]
Battista, Francesca [Auteur]
Scientific editor(s) :
Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne (CES UMR 8174)
Publisher :
Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne (CES - UMR8174)
Publication date :
2022-06-17
ISSN :
1955-611X
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Economies et finances
English abstract : [en]
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) exert pressure on multinational enterprises (MNE) to force the application of social and environmental standards for subcontractors in developing countries. Non-governmental regulation ...
Show more >Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) exert pressure on multinational enterprises (MNE) to force the application of social and environmental standards for subcontractors in developing countries. Non-governmental regulation relies on voluntary standards defined by the NGOs,or by the MNE themselves. This leads to an uncertainty and social regulation. In this respect, external pressure from NGOs constitutes a reputational risk for the company. MNEs, in turn, try to manage those risks by increasingly monitoring the environmental and social impact of their global suppliers. Two forms of non-governmental enforcement currently prevail: warning (i.e.disclosing information of a violation to the company) versus immediate punishment (i.e. penalizing a company without disclosing information). A theoretical model is developed to determine whether disclosing (or not) information to the MNE about reputational risk is more effective. The results demonstrate that MNEs with a low reputation (or a high degree of out-sourcing) will have a higher incentive to conduct inspections of its global suppliers in a warning regime. Conversely, when MNE visibility is high, disclosing information in advance does not provide additional incentives.Show less >
Show more >Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) exert pressure on multinational enterprises (MNE) to force the application of social and environmental standards for subcontractors in developing countries. Non-governmental regulation relies on voluntary standards defined by the NGOs,or by the MNE themselves. This leads to an uncertainty and social regulation. In this respect, external pressure from NGOs constitutes a reputational risk for the company. MNEs, in turn, try to manage those risks by increasingly monitoring the environmental and social impact of their global suppliers. Two forms of non-governmental enforcement currently prevail: warning (i.e.disclosing information of a violation to the company) versus immediate punishment (i.e. penalizing a company without disclosing information). A theoretical model is developed to determine whether disclosing (or not) information to the MNE about reputational risk is more effective. The results demonstrate that MNEs with a low reputation (or a high degree of out-sourcing) will have a higher incentive to conduct inspections of its global suppliers in a warning regime. Conversely, when MNE visibility is high, disclosing information in advance does not provide additional incentives.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Popular science :
Non
Comment :
URL des Documents de travail : https://centredeconomiesorbonne.cnrs.fr/publications/
Source :
Files
- https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03704334/document
- Open access
- Access the document
- https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03704334/document
- Open access
- Access the document
- document
- Open access
- Access the document
- 22013.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document