The height + width = area of a rectangle ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
URL permanente :
Titre :
The height + width = area of a rectangle rule in five-year-olds: Effects of stimulus distribution and graduation of the response scale
Auteur(s) :
Mullet, Etienne [Auteur]
École Pratique des Hautes Études [EPHE]
Paques, Patricia [Auteur]
Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Emotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072 [PSITEC]
Paques, Patricia [Auteur]
École Pratique des Hautes Études [EPHE]
Paques, Patricia [Auteur]
Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Emotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072 [PSITEC]
Paques, Patricia [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Nom court de la revue :
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Numéro :
52
Pagination :
336-343
Éditeur :
Elsevier BV
Date de publication :
1991-12
ISSN :
0022-0965
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This study attempts to account for disparities between the Anderson and Cuneo (1978), Leon (1982), and Lautrey, Mullet, and Paques (1989) studies in regard to children's area judgment. Two task variables were manipulated: ...
Lire la suite >This study attempts to account for disparities between the Anderson and Cuneo (1978), Leon (1982), and Lautrey, Mullet, and Paques (1989) studies in regard to children's area judgment. Two task variables were manipulated: stimulus distribution (biased/unbiased) and the type of response scale (graduated/ungraduated). Three age groups (5, 6, and 7 year olds) were tested. The mean integration pattern for 5-year-olds presented a negatively biased stimulus distribution, and an ungraduated response scale was highly convergent and suggested the use of a centration rule (replication of the Lautrey et al. results). When 5-year-olds were presented with an unbiased stimulus distribution and a graduated scale, the integration pattern was only slightly convergent (as in Leon). The effects of two factors (age and graduation) were significant and combined additively: The older the child, the more graduated the response scale and the more the integration pattern tended to form three ascending parallel lines (the Anderson & Cuneo results).Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This study attempts to account for disparities between the Anderson and Cuneo (1978), Leon (1982), and Lautrey, Mullet, and Paques (1989) studies in regard to children's area judgment. Two task variables were manipulated: stimulus distribution (biased/unbiased) and the type of response scale (graduated/ungraduated). Three age groups (5, 6, and 7 year olds) were tested. The mean integration pattern for 5-year-olds presented a negatively biased stimulus distribution, and an ungraduated response scale was highly convergent and suggested the use of a centration rule (replication of the Lautrey et al. results). When 5-year-olds were presented with an unbiased stimulus distribution and a graduated scale, the integration pattern was only slightly convergent (as in Leon). The effects of two factors (age and graduation) were significant and combined additively: The older the child, the more graduated the response scale and the more the integration pattern tended to form three ascending parallel lines (the Anderson & Cuneo results).Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Date de dépôt :
2022-10-24T12:53:19Z
2022-10-26T09:27:06Z
2022-10-26T09:27:06Z
Fichiers
- the height and width rule Mullet Paques 1991.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès confidentiel
- Accéder au document