Performance Schemata in Dyadic Competition ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Performance Schemata in Dyadic Competition and Cooperation
Auteur(s) :
Dru, Vincent [Auteur]
Université Paris Nanterre [UPN]
Paques Rulence, Patricia [Auteur]
Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale [ULCO]
Mullet, Etienne [Auteur]
École Pratique des Hautes Études [EPHE]
Université Paris Nanterre [UPN]
Paques Rulence, Patricia [Auteur]
Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale [ULCO]
Mullet, Etienne [Auteur]
École Pratique des Hautes Études [EPHE]
Titre de la revue :
The American Journal of Psychology
Nom court de la revue :
The American Journal of Psychology
Numéro :
117
Pagination :
479-496
Éditeur :
JSTOR
Date de publication :
2004
ISSN :
0002-9556
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
We examined performance schemata in dyadic competitive and cooperative situations,
that is, the ways people perceive the relationship between performance level,
capacity level, and degree of motivation in situations in ...
Lire la suite >We examined performance schemata in dyadic competitive and cooperative situations, that is, the ways people perceive the relationship between performance level, capacity level, and degree of motivation in situations in which two people confront or collaborate with one another. In Experiment 1, 104 participants judged the possible performance of Person A, whose ability and motivation levels were communicated, competing against Person B, whose ability and motivation levels were also communicated. When judging A’s performance, participants seemed first to assess the difficulty of the task facing A and second to integrate information relative to A according to a rule with changing parameters already proposed by Surber (1981a, 1981b). In Experiment 2, 140 participants judged either the possible performance of Person A in a cooperative situation or the possible performance of the A–B team using the same material. Results showed that people judge A’s performance or the team’s performance using a very simple additive rule.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >We examined performance schemata in dyadic competitive and cooperative situations, that is, the ways people perceive the relationship between performance level, capacity level, and degree of motivation in situations in which two people confront or collaborate with one another. In Experiment 1, 104 participants judged the possible performance of Person A, whose ability and motivation levels were communicated, competing against Person B, whose ability and motivation levels were also communicated. When judging A’s performance, participants seemed first to assess the difficulty of the task facing A and second to integrate information relative to A according to a rule with changing parameters already proposed by Surber (1981a, 1981b). In Experiment 2, 140 participants judged either the possible performance of Person A in a cooperative situation or the possible performance of the A–B team using the same material. Results showed that people judge A’s performance or the team’s performance using a very simple additive rule.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Date de dépôt :
2022-10-24T13:04:01Z
2022-10-26T09:46:00Z
2022-10-26T09:46:00Z
Fichiers
- performance schemata American Journal of Psychol 2004.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès restreint
- Accéder au document