Performance Schemata in Dyadic Competition ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
Permalink :
Title :
Performance Schemata in Dyadic Competition and Cooperation
Author(s) :
Dru, Vincent [Auteur]
Université Paris Nanterre [UPN]
Paques Rulence, Patricia [Auteur]
Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale [ULCO]
Mullet, Etienne [Auteur]
École Pratique des Hautes Études [EPHE]
Université Paris Nanterre [UPN]
Paques Rulence, Patricia [Auteur]
Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale [ULCO]
Mullet, Etienne [Auteur]
École Pratique des Hautes Études [EPHE]
Journal title :
The American Journal of Psychology
Abbreviated title :
The American Journal of Psychology
Volume number :
117
Pages :
479-496
Publisher :
JSTOR
Publication date :
2004
ISSN :
0002-9556
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences cognitives
English abstract : [en]
We examined performance schemata in dyadic competitive and cooperative situations,
that is, the ways people perceive the relationship between performance level,
capacity level, and degree of motivation in situations in ...
Show more >We examined performance schemata in dyadic competitive and cooperative situations, that is, the ways people perceive the relationship between performance level, capacity level, and degree of motivation in situations in which two people confront or collaborate with one another. In Experiment 1, 104 participants judged the possible performance of Person A, whose ability and motivation levels were communicated, competing against Person B, whose ability and motivation levels were also communicated. When judging A’s performance, participants seemed first to assess the difficulty of the task facing A and second to integrate information relative to A according to a rule with changing parameters already proposed by Surber (1981a, 1981b). In Experiment 2, 140 participants judged either the possible performance of Person A in a cooperative situation or the possible performance of the A–B team using the same material. Results showed that people judge A’s performance or the team’s performance using a very simple additive rule.Show less >
Show more >We examined performance schemata in dyadic competitive and cooperative situations, that is, the ways people perceive the relationship between performance level, capacity level, and degree of motivation in situations in which two people confront or collaborate with one another. In Experiment 1, 104 participants judged the possible performance of Person A, whose ability and motivation levels were communicated, competing against Person B, whose ability and motivation levels were also communicated. When judging A’s performance, participants seemed first to assess the difficulty of the task facing A and second to integrate information relative to A according to a rule with changing parameters already proposed by Surber (1981a, 1981b). In Experiment 2, 140 participants judged either the possible performance of Person A in a cooperative situation or the possible performance of the A–B team using the same material. Results showed that people judge A’s performance or the team’s performance using a very simple additive rule.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2022-10-24T13:04:01Z
2022-10-26T09:46:00Z
2022-10-26T09:46:00Z
Files
- performance schemata American Journal of Psychol 2004.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Restricted access
- Access the document