Autogenous bone grafting with conventional ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Autogenous bone grafting with conventional implants vs zygomatic implants for atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study of the oral health-related quality of life.
Author(s) :
Laventure, Alexandre [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Lauwers, Ludovic [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Nicot, Romain [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Kyheng, Maéva [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ferri, Joel [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Raoul, Gwénaël [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Lauwers, Ludovic [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Nicot, Romain [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Kyheng, Maéva [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ferri, Joel [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Raoul, Gwénaël [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Journal title :
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abbreviated title :
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg
Volume number :
123
Pages :
e782-e789
Publisher :
Elsevier
Publication date :
2022-07-13
ISSN :
2468-7855
Keyword(s) :
Quality of Life
Immediate dental implant loading
Dental implants
Bone transplantation
Zygoma
Maxilla
Immediate dental implant loading
Dental implants
Bone transplantation
Zygoma
Maxilla
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Introduction
Autogenous bone grafting (ABG)–combined or not with Le Fort I osteotomy (LFIO)–and zygomatic implants (ZI) are two reliable techniques for the fixed rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. ZI allow a reduced ...
Show more >Introduction Autogenous bone grafting (ABG)–combined or not with Le Fort I osteotomy (LFIO)–and zygomatic implants (ZI) are two reliable techniques for the fixed rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. ZI allow a reduced treatment duration with no need to graft, immediate loading and in principle less morbidity. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare these two protocols on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). We also discussed implant and prosthetic survival rates, and biological complications. Material and methods All patients who benefited from ZI or ABG with conventional implants (CI) for a fixed maxillary rehabilitation, from November 2011 to April 2019, were included: 21 patients in the ABG group and 22 in the ZI group. OHRQoL was evaluated postoperatively by OHIP-14 questionnaire. Results OHIP-14 median scores were respectively 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0–13.0) and 6.0 (IQR 3.0–10.0) without significant difference (p = 0.97). Implant/prosthetic survival rates were 97.9%/100% and 97.1%/95.5%. Biological complications rates were 33.3% and 36.4% without significant difference (p = 0.83). Discussion The type of surgery or prosthesis does not seem to affect final OHRQoL, implant and prosthetic survival rates or biological complications rates.Show less >
Show more >Introduction Autogenous bone grafting (ABG)–combined or not with Le Fort I osteotomy (LFIO)–and zygomatic implants (ZI) are two reliable techniques for the fixed rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. ZI allow a reduced treatment duration with no need to graft, immediate loading and in principle less morbidity. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare these two protocols on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). We also discussed implant and prosthetic survival rates, and biological complications. Material and methods All patients who benefited from ZI or ABG with conventional implants (CI) for a fixed maxillary rehabilitation, from November 2011 to April 2019, were included: 21 patients in the ABG group and 22 in the ZI group. OHRQoL was evaluated postoperatively by OHIP-14 questionnaire. Results OHIP-14 median scores were respectively 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0–13.0) and 6.0 (IQR 3.0–10.0) without significant difference (p = 0.97). Implant/prosthetic survival rates were 97.9%/100% and 97.1%/95.5%. Biological complications rates were 33.3% and 36.4% without significant difference (p = 0.83). Discussion The type of surgery or prosthesis does not seem to affect final OHRQoL, implant and prosthetic survival rates or biological complications rates.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Collections :
Submission date :
2022-12-08T01:11:32Z
2023-03-01T07:47:18Z
2023-03-01T07:47:18Z