Imbalanced weighting of proactive and ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Imbalanced weighting of proactive and reactive control as a marker of risk-taking propensity
Auteur(s) :
Grisetto, Fanny [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Le Denmat, Pierre [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Delevoye, Yvonne [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Vantrepotte, Quentin [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Davin, Tanguy [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Dinca, Andreea [Auteur]
Desenclos-El Ghoulti, Isabelle [Auteur]
Roger, Clemence [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Le Denmat, Pierre [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Delevoye, Yvonne [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Vantrepotte, Quentin [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Davin, Tanguy [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Dinca, Andreea [Auteur]
Desenclos-El Ghoulti, Isabelle [Auteur]
Roger, Clemence [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Titre de la revue :
PLOS ONE
Numéro :
18
Pagination :
e0277246
Éditeur :
University of Sidney
Date de publication :
2023-01-20
ISSN :
1932-6203
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
According to the dual mechanisms of control (DMC), reactive and proactive control are involved in adjusting behaviors when maladapted to the environment. However, both contextual and inter-individual factors increase the ...
Lire la suite >According to the dual mechanisms of control (DMC), reactive and proactive control are involved in adjusting behaviors when maladapted to the environment. However, both contextual and inter-individual factors increase the weight of one control mechanism over the other, by influencing their cognitive costs. According to one of the DMC postulates, limited reactive control capacities should be counterbalanced by greater proactive control to ensure control efficiency. Moreover, as the flexible weighting between reactive and proactive control is key for adaptive behaviors, we expected that maladaptive behaviors, such as risk-taking, would be characterized by an absence of such counterbalance. However, to our knowledge, no studies have yet investigated this postulate. In the current study, we analyzed the performances of 176 participants on two reaction time tasks (Simon and Stop Signal tasks) and a risk-taking assessment (Balloon Analog Risk Taking, BART). The posterror slowing in the Simon task was used to reflect the spontaneous individuals’ tendency to proactively adjust behaviors after an error. The Stop Signal Reaction Time was used to assess reactive inhibition capacities and the duration of the button press in the BART was used as an index of risk-taking propensity. Results showed that poorer reactive inhibition capacities predicted greater proactive adjustments after an error. Furthermore, the higher the risk-taking propensity, the less reactive inhibition capacities predicted proactive behavioral adjustments. The reported results suggest that higher risk-taking is associated with a smaller weighting of proactive control in response to limited reactive inhibition capacities. These findings highlight the importance of considering the imbalanced weighting of reactive and proactive control in the analysis of risk-taking, and in a broader sense, maladaptive behaviors.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >According to the dual mechanisms of control (DMC), reactive and proactive control are involved in adjusting behaviors when maladapted to the environment. However, both contextual and inter-individual factors increase the weight of one control mechanism over the other, by influencing their cognitive costs. According to one of the DMC postulates, limited reactive control capacities should be counterbalanced by greater proactive control to ensure control efficiency. Moreover, as the flexible weighting between reactive and proactive control is key for adaptive behaviors, we expected that maladaptive behaviors, such as risk-taking, would be characterized by an absence of such counterbalance. However, to our knowledge, no studies have yet investigated this postulate. In the current study, we analyzed the performances of 176 participants on two reaction time tasks (Simon and Stop Signal tasks) and a risk-taking assessment (Balloon Analog Risk Taking, BART). The posterror slowing in the Simon task was used to reflect the spontaneous individuals’ tendency to proactively adjust behaviors after an error. The Stop Signal Reaction Time was used to assess reactive inhibition capacities and the duration of the button press in the BART was used as an index of risk-taking propensity. Results showed that poorer reactive inhibition capacities predicted greater proactive adjustments after an error. Furthermore, the higher the risk-taking propensity, the less reactive inhibition capacities predicted proactive behavioral adjustments. The reported results suggest that higher risk-taking is associated with a smaller weighting of proactive control in response to limited reactive inhibition capacities. These findings highlight the importance of considering the imbalanced weighting of reactive and proactive control in the analysis of risk-taking, and in a broader sense, maladaptive behaviors.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Équipe Action, Vision et Apprentissage (AVA)
Date de dépôt :
2023-01-24T11:23:08Z
2023-01-25T07:13:19Z
2023-03-29T17:47:48Z
2023-01-25T07:13:19Z
2023-03-29T17:47:48Z
Fichiers
- Grisetto et al. (2023).pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document