What is the nature of the crisis in French ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
URL permanente :
Titre :
What is the nature of the crisis in French unionism? A reading from the perspective of models of production
Auteur(s) :
Calderon Gil, Jose [Auteur]
Centre Lillois d'Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques (CLERSE) - UMR 8019

Centre Lillois d'Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques (CLERSE) - UMR 8019
Titre de la revue :
Workers of the World. International Journal on Strikes and Social Conflicts
Numéro :
9
Éditeur :
Cornell University
Date de publication :
2018-05
ISSN :
2182-893
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Sociologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
The gradual change in the model of production since the 1970s produced a heterogenization and polarization of workers’ terms of employment— between, on the one hand, a segment of workers with stable employment, legal ...
Lire la suite >The gradual change in the model of production since the 1970s produced a heterogenization and polarization of workers’ terms of employment— between, on the one hand, a segment of workers with stable employment, legal protection and good representation by the unions and on the other hand an increasingly populous segment of peripheral workers who were cut off collective bargaining and whose terms of employment were “negotiated" individually when they were hired. By this analysis, it is not so much the institutionalization of French unionism that lies behind its crisis as the de-institutionalization of the wage relationship, one of the conditions of which seems to be the weakening of the union itself. The unions find themselves in a situation where they alone are opposing an increased riskiness in labour relations that, while distancing them from the peripheral segments of the workforce, is locking them into defensive positions.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >The gradual change in the model of production since the 1970s produced a heterogenization and polarization of workers’ terms of employment— between, on the one hand, a segment of workers with stable employment, legal protection and good representation by the unions and on the other hand an increasingly populous segment of peripheral workers who were cut off collective bargaining and whose terms of employment were “negotiated" individually when they were hired. By this analysis, it is not so much the institutionalization of French unionism that lies behind its crisis as the de-institutionalization of the wage relationship, one of the conditions of which seems to be the weakening of the union itself. The unions find themselves in a situation where they alone are opposing an increased riskiness in labour relations that, while distancing them from the peripheral segments of the workforce, is locking them into defensive positions.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Références liée(s) :
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Collections :
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Mondes du travail et mondes privés
Date de dépôt :
2023-05-26T09:20:30Z
2023-06-06T09:23:14Z
2023-06-06T09:23:14Z
Fichiers
- Workers of the world.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès restreint
- Accéder au document