How to select proper interdental brush ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
How to select proper interdental brush size in periodontitis patients: Comparison of the reliability of two methods among novice and expert users.
Auteur(s) :
Petit, J. [Auteur]
Huon, C. [Auteur]
Nicolas, T. [Auteur]
Sy, Kadiatou [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Dubar, M. [Auteur]
Agossa, Kevimy [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Huon, C. [Auteur]
Nicolas, T. [Auteur]
Sy, Kadiatou [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Dubar, M. [Auteur]
Agossa, Kevimy [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Titre de la revue :
American Journal of Dentistry
Numéro :
34
Pagination :
186-189
Date de publication :
2021-08-13
ISSN :
0894-8275
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Purpose: To compare two methods used by novice and expert operators for selecting interdental brush (IDB) size for periodontitis patients: (1) sequential testing or (2) using a color-coded taper tip device (CTD) corresponding ...
Lire la suite >Purpose: To compare two methods used by novice and expert operators for selecting interdental brush (IDB) size for periodontitis patients: (1) sequential testing or (2) using a color-coded taper tip device (CTD) corresponding to color-coded brush sizes. Methods: Six operators, one experienced and five dental students, employed both methods to determine the IDB with best fit for 204 interdental spaces in 34 periodontitis patients. The percentage of agreement and the inter-methods reliability was evaluated. The influence of anatomical features on differences between the operators or method was also investigated. Results: Moderate to substantial correlation was found between the two methods but the reliability was stronger when different operators used the same method, irrespective of the method, than when they used a different method. Among the anatomical factors studied, only sites in molar regions were associated with significant differences. Clinical significance: Use of a dedicated color-coded taper tip may be an alternative to the fastidious sequential testing of different IDB in selecting best-fit IDB diameter for periodontal patients with moderate to broad interdental spaces.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Purpose: To compare two methods used by novice and expert operators for selecting interdental brush (IDB) size for periodontitis patients: (1) sequential testing or (2) using a color-coded taper tip device (CTD) corresponding to color-coded brush sizes. Methods: Six operators, one experienced and five dental students, employed both methods to determine the IDB with best fit for 204 interdental spaces in 34 periodontitis patients. The percentage of agreement and the inter-methods reliability was evaluated. The influence of anatomical features on differences between the operators or method was also investigated. Results: Moderate to substantial correlation was found between the two methods but the reliability was stronger when different operators used the same method, irrespective of the method, than when they used a different method. Among the anatomical factors studied, only sites in molar regions were associated with significant differences. Clinical significance: Use of a dedicated color-coded taper tip may be an alternative to the fastidious sequential testing of different IDB in selecting best-fit IDB diameter for periodontal patients with moderate to broad interdental spaces.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2023-05-30T07:01:39Z
2023-09-01T12:14:42Z
2023-09-01T12:14:42Z