Analysis of clinical pharmacist interventions ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Titre :
Analysis of clinical pharmacist interventions in the COVID-19 units of a French university hospital.
Auteur(s) :
Perez, Maxime [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Masse, Morgane [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Deldicque, Anne [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
De Groote, Pascal [Auteur]
Institut Pasteur de Lille
Hôpital cardiologique
Desbordes, Jacques [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Fry, Stephanie [Auteur]
Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille - INSERM U 1019 - UMR 9017 - UMR 8204 [CIIL]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Musy, Elodie [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Odou, Pascal [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Puisieux, Francois [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Lambert, Marc [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Scherpereel, Arnaud [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Hôpital Albert Calmette
Décaudin, Bertrand [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Masse, Morgane [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Deldicque, Anne [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste [Auteur]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
De Groote, Pascal [Auteur]

Institut Pasteur de Lille
Hôpital cardiologique
Desbordes, Jacques [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Fry, Stephanie [Auteur]

Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille - INSERM U 1019 - UMR 9017 - UMR 8204 [CIIL]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Musy, Elodie [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Odou, Pascal [Auteur]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Puisieux, Francois [Auteur]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Lambert, Marc [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Scherpereel, Arnaud [Auteur]

Université de Lille
Hôpital Albert Calmette
Décaudin, Bertrand [Auteur]

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Titre de la revue :
European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
Pagination :
e30-e35
Éditeur :
BMJ Group
Date de publication :
2021-03-13
ISSN :
2047-9956
Mot(s)-clé(s) :
drug-related side effects and adverse reactions
education
pharmacy
administration
intravenous
pharmacy service
hospital
medical errors
education
pharmacy
administration
intravenous
pharmacy service
hospital
medical errors
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Objectives The objectives were to compare clinical pharmacist interventions between two care groups: COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients, and to identify drugs that require particular attention, especially ...
Lire la suite >Objectives The objectives were to compare clinical pharmacist interventions between two care groups: COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients, and to identify drugs that require particular attention, especially those involved in COVID-19 management.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients with positive and negative COVID-19 statuses admitted to Lille University Hospital over 1 month. Pharmaceutical analysis instigated interventions to rectify drug-related errors. For each pharmaceutical intervention (PI), the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification of the drug and the outcome of such an intervention were specified.Results The study included 438 patients. Prescription analysis led to 188 PIs performed on 118 patients (64 COVID-19-positive patients and 54 COVID-19-negative patients). Most drug-related problems were incorrect dosage representing 36.7% (69/188) of all interventions: 27.9% (29/104) for the COVID-19-positive group and 47.6% (40/84) for the COVID-19-negative group. The most frequent PI in 34% (64/188) of cases was terminating a drug: 27.9% (29/104) for the COVID-19-positive group and 47.6% (40/84) for the COVID-19-negative group. The main drug classes involved were antithrombotic agents (20.7%, 39/188), antibacterials for systemic use (13.8%, 26/188) and drugs for gastric acid-related disorders (6.4%, 12/188). Study population was limited to a single centre over 1 month.Conclusion No difference in PI was noted between the two groups. The presence of pharmacists led to a reduction in drug-related prescription problems, especially for antithrombotic and antibacterial drugs for both groups. Clinical pharmacy commitment in such a pandemic is therefore important.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Objectives The objectives were to compare clinical pharmacist interventions between two care groups: COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients, and to identify drugs that require particular attention, especially those involved in COVID-19 management.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients with positive and negative COVID-19 statuses admitted to Lille University Hospital over 1 month. Pharmaceutical analysis instigated interventions to rectify drug-related errors. For each pharmaceutical intervention (PI), the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification of the drug and the outcome of such an intervention were specified.Results The study included 438 patients. Prescription analysis led to 188 PIs performed on 118 patients (64 COVID-19-positive patients and 54 COVID-19-negative patients). Most drug-related problems were incorrect dosage representing 36.7% (69/188) of all interventions: 27.9% (29/104) for the COVID-19-positive group and 47.6% (40/84) for the COVID-19-negative group. The most frequent PI in 34% (64/188) of cases was terminating a drug: 27.9% (29/104) for the COVID-19-positive group and 47.6% (40/84) for the COVID-19-negative group. The main drug classes involved were antithrombotic agents (20.7%, 39/188), antibacterials for systemic use (13.8%, 26/188) and drugs for gastric acid-related disorders (6.4%, 12/188). Study population was limited to a single centre over 1 month.Conclusion No difference in PI was noted between the two groups. The presence of pharmacists led to a reduction in drug-related prescription problems, especially for antithrombotic and antibacterial drugs for both groups. Clinical pharmacy commitment in such a pandemic is therefore important.Lire moins >
Langue :
Français
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Source :