Titre :

Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in non-neurogenic men: a place for out-patient surgery

Auteur(s) :

Nasri, Jordan [Auteur]
Beraud, F. [Auteur]
Seguier, Denis [Auteur]
Delporte, Gauthier [Auteur]
Behal, Helene [Auteur]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Olivier, Jonathan [Auteur]
Villers, Arnauld [Auteur]
Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies (CANTHER) - UMR 9020 - UMR 1277
Marcelli, F. [Auteur]
Biardeau, Xavier [Auteur]

Titre de la revue :

World Journal of Urology

Nom court de la revue :

World J Urol

Numéro :

39

Pagination :

p. 3541–3547

Date de publication :

2021

ISSN :

1433-8726

Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :

Day-case
Ambulatory
Artificial urinary sphincter
Male stress urinary incontinence

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Résumé en anglais : [en]

Objective To assess feasibility, safety and risk factors for failure associated with out-patient surgery for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation/revision in non-neurogenic men. Materials In the present ...
Lire la suite >Objective To assess feasibility, safety and risk factors for failure associated with out-patient surgery for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation/revision in non-neurogenic men. Materials In the present retrospective monocentric study conducted between May 2016 and March 2020, 81 patients undergoing AUS implantation or revision during an out-patient surgery were included. The primary outcome was the success rate of out-patient surgery. Success was assessed using two distinct definitions, a narrow definition, where success was defined as a one-day hospitalization and the absence of any unscheduled consultation or re-hospitalization within the 3 days following surgery, a broad definition, where success was defined as a one-day hospitalization and the absence of any unscheduled re-hospitalization within the 3 days following surgery. In parallel, risk factors for failure of out-patient surgery, as well as efficacy and safety were assessed. Results Eighty-one patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 71.2 years ± 5.9. Out-patient surgery was successfully completed in 58 men (71.6% [95% CI 60.5–81.1]) and in 76 men (93.8% [95% CI 86.2–97.9]) according to the narrow and the broad definition, respectively. After multivariate analysis, anticoagulant therapy (OR 25.97 [95% CI 4.44–152.04]) and low socio-professional status (OR 22.1 [95% CI 3.701–131.95]) were statistically associated with failure of out-patient surgery. The continence rate after a 90-day follow-up was 79%. Conclusion AUS implantation/revision in non-neurogenic men could be safely proposed in out-patient surgery. Special attention may however be paid to patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy or belonging to a low socio-professional category.Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Vulgarisation :

Non

Établissement(s) :

Université de Lille
CHU Lille

Collections :

• Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies (CANTHER) - UMR 9020 - UMR 1277
• METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694

Date de dépôt :

2023-11-15T07:02:46Z
2024-02-27T13:58:04Z