Counterconditioning as a crucible for ...
Type de document :
Autre communication scientifique (congrès sans actes - poster - séminaire...): Communication dans un congrès sans actes
URL permanente :
Titre :
Counterconditioning as a crucible for studying associative interference
Auteur(s) :
Pena, Tori [Auteur]
Pollack, Cody R. [Auteur]
Berutti, Alaina [Auteur]
Li, Audrey [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Villement, Yoan [Auteur]
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Miller, Ralph R. [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Pollack, Cody R. [Auteur]
Berutti, Alaina [Auteur]
Li, Audrey [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Villement, Yoan [Auteur]
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Miller, Ralph R. [Auteur]
Binghamton University [SUNY]
Titre de la manifestation scientifique :
Eastern Psychological Association
Ville :
Philadelphia, PA
Pays :
Etats-Unis d'Amérique
Date de début de la manifestation scientifique :
2018-03-01
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Counterconditioning (i.e., cue-outcome1 followed by cue-outcome2) is the most traditional instance of associative interference and hence a good preparation to seek general rules of interference. Extinction is rather similar, ...
Lire la suite >Counterconditioning (i.e., cue-outcome1 followed by cue-outcome2) is the most traditional instance of associative interference and hence a good preparation to seek general rules of interference. Extinction is rather similar, although it replaces outcome2 with the absense of any explicit event. Counterconditioning is typically more effective than extinction. However, we failed to find this relationship either with neutraloutcomes or outcomes of opposing valence. Our experiments speak to the role of outcome.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Counterconditioning (i.e., cue-outcome1 followed by cue-outcome2) is the most traditional instance of associative interference and hence a good preparation to seek general rules of interference. Extinction is rather similar, although it replaces outcome2 with the absense of any explicit event. Counterconditioning is typically more effective than extinction. However, we failed to find this relationship either with neutraloutcomes or outcomes of opposing valence. Our experiments speak to the role of outcome.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Équipe Action, Vision et Apprentissage (AVA)
Date de dépôt :
2023-11-22T15:47:34Z
2023-11-23T09:19:55Z
2023-11-23T09:19:55Z