Testing two competitive models of empathic ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Testing two competitive models of empathic communication in cancer care encounters: A factorial analysis of the CARE measure
Auteur(s) :
Gehenne, Lucie [Auteur]
Lelorain, Sophie [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Anota, Amélie [Auteur]
Brédart, Anne [Auteur]
Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé [LPPS (URP_4057)]
Dolbeault, Sylvie [Auteur]
Sultan, Serge [Auteur]
CHU Sainte Justine [Montréal]
Piessen, Guillaume [Auteur]
Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies (CANTHER) - UMR 9020 - UMR 1277
Grynberg, Delphine [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Baudry, Anne-Sophie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Christophe, Veronique [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Lelorain, Sophie [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Anota, Amélie [Auteur]
Brédart, Anne [Auteur]
Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé [LPPS (URP_4057)]
Dolbeault, Sylvie [Auteur]
Sultan, Serge [Auteur]
CHU Sainte Justine [Montréal]
Piessen, Guillaume [Auteur]
Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies (CANTHER) - UMR 9020 - UMR 1277
Grynberg, Delphine [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Baudry, Anne-Sophie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Christophe, Veronique [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Titre de la revue :
European Journal of Cancer Care
Nom court de la revue :
Eur J Cancer Care
Numéro :
29
Pagination :
e13306
Éditeur :
Hindawi Limited
Date de publication :
2020-11
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Objective:
The mechanisms associating physician empathy (PE) with patient outcomes remain unclear. PE can be considered as a whole (one process) or three subcomponents can be identified (an establishing rapport process; ...
Lire la suite >Objective: The mechanisms associating physician empathy (PE) with patient outcomes remain unclear. PE can be considered as a whole (one process) or three subcomponents can be identified (an establishing rapport process; an emotional process; a cognitive process). The objective was to test two competitive models of PE in cancer care: a three-process model adapted from Neumann's model versus a one-process model, with the use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure (CARE). Methods: The CARE was completed by 488 oesogastric cancer patients from the national French database FREGAT. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and a bifactor model were performed to test the two competitive models. Results: The CFA revealed that the one-factor structure showed a moderate fit to the data whereas the three-factor structure showed a good fit. However, the bifactor model favoured unidimensionality. Conclusion: We cannot provide a clear-cut conclusion about whether PE should be considered as on unique process or not. Further work is still needed. Meanwhile, one should not preclude the use of three subscores in cancer care if specific elements of the encounter need to be assessed.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Objective: The mechanisms associating physician empathy (PE) with patient outcomes remain unclear. PE can be considered as a whole (one process) or three subcomponents can be identified (an establishing rapport process; an emotional process; a cognitive process). The objective was to test two competitive models of PE in cancer care: a three-process model adapted from Neumann's model versus a one-process model, with the use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure (CARE). Methods: The CARE was completed by 488 oesogastric cancer patients from the national French database FREGAT. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and a bifactor model were performed to test the two competitive models. Results: The CFA revealed that the one-factor structure showed a moderate fit to the data whereas the three-factor structure showed a good fit. However, the bifactor model favoured unidimensionality. Conclusion: We cannot provide a clear-cut conclusion about whether PE should be considered as on unique process or not. Further work is still needed. Meanwhile, one should not preclude the use of three subscores in cancer care if specific elements of the encounter need to be assessed.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Autre(s) projet(s) ou source(s) de financement :
This research was funded by the SIRIC (SIte de Recherche Intégrée sur le Cancer) ONCOLille. This study was supported by an INCa doctoral grant (Institut National du Cancer) awarded to Lucie Gehenne. FREGAT was funded with support from the Institut National du Cancer (INCa), and CHU de Lille is the sponsor of the FREGAT study.
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Équipe Dynamique Émotionnelle et Pathologies (DEEP)
Date de dépôt :
2023-11-22T20:13:49Z
2023-11-29T18:31:19Z
2023-11-29T18:31:19Z