Effectiveness of Intensive Versus Minimalist ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Effectiveness of Intensive Versus Minimalist Follow-Up Regimen on Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer (TOTEM Study): A Randomized, Pragmatic, Parallel Group, Multicenter Trial.
Auteur(s) :
Zola, P. [Auteur]
Ciccone, G. [Auteur]
Piovano, E. [Auteur]
Fuso, L. [Auteur]
Di Cuonzo, D. [Auteur]
Castiglione, A. [Auteur]
Pagano, E. [Auteur]
Peirano, E. [Auteur]
Landoni, F. [Auteur]
Sartori, E. [Auteur]
Narducci, Fabrice [Auteur]
Protéomique, Réponse Inflammatoire, Spectrométrie de Masse (PRISM) - U1192
Bertetto, O. [Auteur]
Ferrero, A. [Auteur]
Ciccone, G. [Auteur]
Piovano, E. [Auteur]
Fuso, L. [Auteur]
Di Cuonzo, D. [Auteur]
Castiglione, A. [Auteur]
Pagano, E. [Auteur]
Peirano, E. [Auteur]
Landoni, F. [Auteur]
Sartori, E. [Auteur]
Narducci, Fabrice [Auteur]
Protéomique, Réponse Inflammatoire, Spectrométrie de Masse (PRISM) - U1192
Bertetto, O. [Auteur]
Ferrero, A. [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Nom court de la revue :
J Clin Oncol
Pagination :
JCO2200471
Date de publication :
2022-07-23
ISSN :
1527-7755
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
PURPOSE In the absence of clear evidence from randomized trials, the intensity of follow-up regimens after
surgical treatment of endometrial cancer is highly variable in clinical practice. To reduce this uncertainty, ...
Lire la suite >PURPOSE In the absence of clear evidence from randomized trials, the intensity of follow-up regimens after surgical treatment of endometrial cancer is highly variable in clinical practice. To reduce this uncertainty, we conducted a randomized trial to test whether an intensive (INT) versus a minimalist (MIN) follow-up regimen improves overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing operation for endometrial cancer. METHODS The TOTEM study was a large, pragmatic randomized trial, conducted in 42 hospitals (in Italy and France) including patients surgically treated for endometrial cancer, in complete clinical remission, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-IV. After stratification by center and risk of relapse (low or high), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to INT or MIN hospital-based follow-up regimens. The study was powered to demonstrate an absolute improvement of 5% of the 5-year OS with the INT regimen. RESULTS In total, 1,871 patients were randomly assigned between November 2008 and July 2018, and 1,847 patients (98.7%) were available for the final analysis (60% low risk). After a median follow-up of 69 months, the 5-year OS was 90.6% in the INT and 91.9% in the MIN arms (hazard ratio, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.50, P 5 .380). No differences in OS were found in subgroup analyses considering age, cancer treatment, risk of relapse, and degree of adherence of the center to the scheduled follow-up. The probability of detecting a relapse was slightly higher in the INT arm (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48; P 5 .194). CONCLUSION An INT follow-up in endometrial cancer–treated patients does not improve OS, even in high-risk patients. According to available evidence, there is no need to routinely add vaginal cytology, laboratory, or imaging investigations to the MIN regimens used in this trial.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >PURPOSE In the absence of clear evidence from randomized trials, the intensity of follow-up regimens after surgical treatment of endometrial cancer is highly variable in clinical practice. To reduce this uncertainty, we conducted a randomized trial to test whether an intensive (INT) versus a minimalist (MIN) follow-up regimen improves overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing operation for endometrial cancer. METHODS The TOTEM study was a large, pragmatic randomized trial, conducted in 42 hospitals (in Italy and France) including patients surgically treated for endometrial cancer, in complete clinical remission, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-IV. After stratification by center and risk of relapse (low or high), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to INT or MIN hospital-based follow-up regimens. The study was powered to demonstrate an absolute improvement of 5% of the 5-year OS with the INT regimen. RESULTS In total, 1,871 patients were randomly assigned between November 2008 and July 2018, and 1,847 patients (98.7%) were available for the final analysis (60% low risk). After a median follow-up of 69 months, the 5-year OS was 90.6% in the INT and 91.9% in the MIN arms (hazard ratio, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.50, P 5 .380). No differences in OS were found in subgroup analyses considering age, cancer treatment, risk of relapse, and degree of adherence of the center to the scheduled follow-up. The probability of detecting a relapse was slightly higher in the INT arm (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48; P 5 .194). CONCLUSION An INT follow-up in endometrial cancer–treated patients does not improve OS, even in high-risk patients. According to available evidence, there is no need to routinely add vaginal cytology, laboratory, or imaging investigations to the MIN regimens used in this trial.Lire moins >
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Date de dépôt :
2023-12-13T04:11:05Z
2024-01-31T13:44:48Z
2024-01-31T13:44:48Z
Fichiers
- zola-et-al-2022-effectiveness-of-intensive-versus-minimalist-follow-up-regimen-on-survival-in-patients-with-endometrial.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document