Between‐Individual Differences in Baseline ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
Permalink :
Title :
Between‐Individual Differences in Baseline Well‐Being and Emotion Regulation Strategy Use Moderate the Effect of a Self‐Help Cognitive‐Behavioral Intervention for Typical Adults
Author(s) :
Pavani, Jean‐Baptiste [Auteur]
Berna, Guillaume [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Andreotti, Eva [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Guiller, Theo [Auteur]
Antoine, Pascal [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Dauvier, Bruno [Auteur]
Congard, Anne [Auteur]
Berna, Guillaume [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Andreotti, Eva [Auteur]
Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab) - UMR 9193
Guiller, Theo [Auteur]
Antoine, Pascal [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Dauvier, Bruno [Auteur]
Congard, Anne [Auteur]
Journal title :
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
Volume number :
12
Pages :
411-431
Publisher :
Wiley
Publication date :
2019-12-23
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences cognitives
English abstract : [en]
BackgroundSelf‐help interventions intended to help nonclinical individuals regulate their emotions can have important social benefits (i.e. mental disorder prevention, well‐being promotion). However, their mean effect size ...
Show more >BackgroundSelf‐help interventions intended to help nonclinical individuals regulate their emotions can have important social benefits (i.e. mental disorder prevention, well‐being promotion). However, their mean effect size on well‐being is generally low, possibly because there are considerable between‐individual differences in the response to these interventions. The present study examined whether individuals’ baseline levels of emotional well‐being and engagement in emotion regulation strategies moderate the effects on these same variables in a 4‐week self‐help cognitive‐behavioral intervention intended for typical adults.MethodsData were collected from 158 nonclinical French adults (n = 95 for the control group, n = 63 for the cognitive‐behavioral group) using experience sampling. Emotional well‐being was assessed, as well as the engagement in three emotion regulation strategies (i.e. cognitive reappraisal, problem solving, and appreciation).ResultsAs expected, the post‐test scores on some variables were significantly predicted by the interactions between the intervention and the pre‐test scores on these same variables. In particular, it was the participants with the most negative baseline levels (i.e. low emotional well‐being, low engagement in appreciation) who benefitted most from the intervention.ConclusionsResults are discussed in the light of current knowledge on between‐individual differences in how individuals respond to interventions.Show less >
Show more >BackgroundSelf‐help interventions intended to help nonclinical individuals regulate their emotions can have important social benefits (i.e. mental disorder prevention, well‐being promotion). However, their mean effect size on well‐being is generally low, possibly because there are considerable between‐individual differences in the response to these interventions. The present study examined whether individuals’ baseline levels of emotional well‐being and engagement in emotion regulation strategies moderate the effects on these same variables in a 4‐week self‐help cognitive‐behavioral intervention intended for typical adults.MethodsData were collected from 158 nonclinical French adults (n = 95 for the control group, n = 63 for the cognitive‐behavioral group) using experience sampling. Emotional well‐being was assessed, as well as the engagement in three emotion regulation strategies (i.e. cognitive reappraisal, problem solving, and appreciation).ResultsAs expected, the post‐test scores on some variables were significantly predicted by the interactions between the intervention and the pre‐test scores on these same variables. In particular, it was the participants with the most negative baseline levels (i.e. low emotional well‐being, low engagement in appreciation) who benefitted most from the intervention.ConclusionsResults are discussed in the light of current knowledge on between‐individual differences in how individuals respond to interventions.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Research team(s) :
Équipe Dynamique Émotionnelle et Pathologies (DEEP)
Submission date :
2023-12-31T16:43:20Z
2023-12-31T19:16:58Z
2024-01-20T09:09:19Z
2023-12-31T19:16:58Z
2024-01-20T09:09:19Z
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document