Non-convex functionals penalizing simultaneous ...
Type de document :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
Titre :
Non-convex functionals penalizing simultaneous oscillations along independent directions: rigidity estimates
Auteur(s) :
Goldman, Michael [Auteur]
Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions [LJLL (UMR_7598)]
Merlet, Benoît [Auteur]
Reliable numerical approximations of dissipative systems [RAPSODI]
Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions [LJLL (UMR_7598)]
Merlet, Benoît [Auteur]
Reliable numerical approximations of dissipative systems [RAPSODI]
Titre de la revue :
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze
Pagination :
1473--1509
Éditeur :
Scuola Normale Superiore
Date de publication :
2021
ISSN :
0391-173X
Discipline(s) HAL :
Mathématiques [math]/Equations aux dérivées partielles [math.AP]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
We study a family of non-convex functionals {E} on the space of measurable functions u : Ω 1 × Ω 2 ⊂ R n 1 × R n 2 → R. These functionals vanish on the non-convex subset S(Ω 1 × Ω 2) formed by functions of the form u(x 1 ...
Lire la suite >We study a family of non-convex functionals {E} on the space of measurable functions u : Ω 1 × Ω 2 ⊂ R n 1 × R n 2 → R. These functionals vanish on the non-convex subset S(Ω 1 × Ω 2) formed by functions of the form u(x 1 , x 2) = u 1 (x 1) or u(x 1 , x 2) = u 2 (x 2). We investigate under which conditions the converse implication "E(u) = 0 ⇒ u ∈ S(Ω 1 × Ω 2)" holds. In particular, we show that the answer depends strongly on the smoothness of u. We also obtain quantitative versions of this implication by proving that (at least for some parameters) E(u) controls in a strong sense the distance of u to S(Ω 1 × Ω 2).Lire moins >
Lire la suite >We study a family of non-convex functionals {E} on the space of measurable functions u : Ω 1 × Ω 2 ⊂ R n 1 × R n 2 → R. These functionals vanish on the non-convex subset S(Ω 1 × Ω 2) formed by functions of the form u(x 1 , x 2) = u 1 (x 1) or u(x 1 , x 2) = u 2 (x 2). We investigate under which conditions the converse implication "E(u) = 0 ⇒ u ∈ S(Ω 1 × Ω 2)" holds. In particular, we show that the answer depends strongly on the smoothness of u. We also obtain quantitative versions of this implication by proving that (at least for some parameters) E(u) controls in a strong sense the distance of u to S(Ω 1 × Ω 2).Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Vulgarisation :
Non
Projet ANR :
Collections :
Source :
Fichiers
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- CharacterizationOf1dFunctions_Part1_final.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- 1905.07905
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- CharacterizationOf1dFunctions_Part1_final.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document