Pregnancy and delivery of teenagers: is ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Pregnancy and delivery of teenagers: is the obstetrical prognosis worst between 13-15 years old?
Author(s) :
Wemaux-Denis, C. [Auteur]
Garabedian, Charles [Auteur]
Huc, A. [Auteur]
Cailleret, O. [Auteur]
Depoortere, M-H [Auteur]
Hammou, Y. [Auteur]
Subtil, Damien [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Garabedian, Charles [Auteur]
Huc, A. [Auteur]
Cailleret, O. [Auteur]
Depoortere, M-H [Auteur]
Hammou, Y. [Auteur]
Subtil, Damien [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Journal title :
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie
Abbreviated title :
Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. Senol.
Volume number :
45
Pages :
5-8
Publication date :
2017-01-01
ISSN :
2468-7197
English keyword(s) :
Congenital malformation
Adolescence
Preterm birth
Delivery
Caesarean section
Adolescence
Preterm birth
Delivery
Caesarean section
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognosis of pregnancy and delivery of 13-15years old patients compared to teenagers aged of 16-17.
METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of a continuous series of 13-15 teenagers followed in ...
Show more >OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognosis of pregnancy and delivery of 13-15years old patients compared to teenagers aged of 16-17. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of a continuous series of 13-15 teenagers followed in a public maternity between 1996 and 2012 compared to a series of patients aged of 16-17 matched on the day of the delivery (two controls for a case). RESULTS: Seventy-three teens 13-15 were followed during the study period, and 146 adolescents aged 16-17 were included and matched. The two groups did not differ regarding size, weight or medical history. Younger patients were more often educated than older ones (46.6 vs 27.4%, P<0.01). The incidence of congenital malformations was high but substantially identical in the two groups (9.6 vs 11.0%, NS), as well as prematurity concerned that almost one third of patients (27.4 vs 30.1%, NS). The Caesarean section rate was low (11.0 vs 10.3%, NS). The frequency of birth weight below the 10th percentile did not differ between groups (15.1 vs 19.9%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Teenage girls of 13-15years old have high perinatal risk (prematurity, congenital malformation), and frequently delivery vaginally. These risks do not seem superior to those of adolescent girls aged of 16-17years old.Show less >
Show more >OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognosis of pregnancy and delivery of 13-15years old patients compared to teenagers aged of 16-17. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of a continuous series of 13-15 teenagers followed in a public maternity between 1996 and 2012 compared to a series of patients aged of 16-17 matched on the day of the delivery (two controls for a case). RESULTS: Seventy-three teens 13-15 were followed during the study period, and 146 adolescents aged 16-17 were included and matched. The two groups did not differ regarding size, weight or medical history. Younger patients were more often educated than older ones (46.6 vs 27.4%, P<0.01). The incidence of congenital malformations was high but substantially identical in the two groups (9.6 vs 11.0%, NS), as well as prematurity concerned that almost one third of patients (27.4 vs 30.1%, NS). The Caesarean section rate was low (11.0 vs 10.3%, NS). The frequency of birth weight below the 10th percentile did not differ between groups (15.1 vs 19.9%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Teenage girls of 13-15years old have high perinatal risk (prematurity, congenital malformation), and frequently delivery vaginally. These risks do not seem superior to those of adolescent girls aged of 16-17years old.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T18:16:12Z