Idiosyncratic deals from a distributive ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
Titre :
Idiosyncratic deals from a distributive justice perspective: examining co-workers' voice behavior, Journal of Business Ethics
Auteur(s) :
Marescaux, Elise [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Sels, Luc [Auteur]
de Winne, Sophie [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Sels, Luc [Auteur]
de Winne, Sophie [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Journal of Business Ethics
Pagination :
263-281
Éditeur :
Springer Verlag
Date de publication :
2019-01
ISSN :
0167-4544
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Distributive justice
Equity
Idiosyncratic deals
I-deals
Voice
Co-worker reactions
Equity
Idiosyncratic deals
I-deals
Voice
Co-worker reactions
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et management
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et management
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This study focuses on a third-party perspective of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals). More specifically, we look into the differential judgments co-workers make about i-deals in their work environment, as well as their reactions. ...
Lire la suite >This study focuses on a third-party perspective of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals). More specifically, we look into the differential judgments co-workers make about i-deals in their work environment, as well as their reactions. Based on equity theory, we examine to what extent the content of the i-deal and the work context (i.e., the functional dependence between co-worker and i-dealer) explain co-worker judgments regarding i-deal fairness in addition to subsequent voice behavior (i.e., complaining and/or requesting compensation). A vignette study with 1988 respondents shows that when i-deals are considered distributively unfair, co-workers try to restore equity through voice behavior, thereby making the i-deal less effective. Furthermore, i-deals spark more distributive injustice perceptions and voice behavior in a highly interdependent work context. Finally, on average, financial bonuses were considered most distributively unfair and, thus, trigger more voice behavior. These results have important implications for i-deal literature as they uncover the criteria that co-workers use to judge i-deals and shape their reactions.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This study focuses on a third-party perspective of idiosyncratic deals (i-deals). More specifically, we look into the differential judgments co-workers make about i-deals in their work environment, as well as their reactions. Based on equity theory, we examine to what extent the content of the i-deal and the work context (i.e., the functional dependence between co-worker and i-dealer) explain co-worker judgments regarding i-deal fairness in addition to subsequent voice behavior (i.e., complaining and/or requesting compensation). A vignette study with 1988 respondents shows that when i-deals are considered distributively unfair, co-workers try to restore equity through voice behavior, thereby making the i-deal less effective. Furthermore, i-deals spark more distributive injustice perceptions and voice behavior in a highly interdependent work context. Finally, on average, financial bonuses were considered most distributively unfair and, thus, trigger more voice behavior. These results have important implications for i-deal literature as they uncover the criteria that co-workers use to judge i-deals and shape their reactions.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :