Of Heroes and Cowards: A Computer-Based ...
Type de document :
Partie d'ouvrage: Chapitre
URL permanente :
Titre :
Of Heroes and Cowards: A Computer-Based Analysis of Narratives Justifying the Use of Force
Auteur(s) :
Sangar, Eric [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Clément, Maéva [Auteur]
Helmut Schmidt University, University of the Armed Forces Hamburg
Lindemann, Thomas [Auteur]
Lindemann, Thomas [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Clément, Maéva [Auteur]
Helmut Schmidt University, University of the Armed Forces Hamburg
Lindemann, Thomas [Auteur]
Lindemann, Thomas [Auteur]
Titre de l’ouvrage :
Researching Emotions in International Relations
Pagination :
179-206
Éditeur :
Palgrave Macmillan
Lieu de publication :
Cham (Suisse)
Date de publication :
2017-12-06
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
Résumé en anglais : [en]
How can we detect narratives that legitimize the use of force? Using the ‘hero-protector narrative’ as a theoretical model to understand how political leaders manufacture collective emotions when advocating the use of force ...
Lire la suite >How can we detect narratives that legitimize the use of force? Using the ‘hero-protector narrative’ as a theoretical model to understand how political leaders manufacture collective emotions when advocating the use of force as the only effective and morally acceptable option, we show how such an argument can be tested using computer-assisted narrative analysis. Based on a case study of political speeches and statements legitimizing-and others rejecting-the use of force in the context of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, we suggest that our methodology offers an innovative approach to uncover similarities (and differences) across narratives used to mobilize collective emotions of moral anger and compassion.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >How can we detect narratives that legitimize the use of force? Using the ‘hero-protector narrative’ as a theoretical model to understand how political leaders manufacture collective emotions when advocating the use of force as the only effective and morally acceptable option, we show how such an argument can be tested using computer-assisted narrative analysis. Based on a case study of political speeches and statements legitimizing-and others rejecting-the use of force in the context of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, we suggest that our methodology offers an innovative approach to uncover similarities (and differences) across narratives used to mobilize collective emotions of moral anger and compassion.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CNRS
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2020-06-07T16:33:02Z
2020-06-12T14:46:33Z
2020-07-07T13:32:21Z
2020-06-12T14:46:33Z
2020-07-07T13:32:21Z