Party penalties for parity: less than meets ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
URL permanente :
Titre :
Party penalties for parity: less than meets the eye
Auteur(s) :
Mazur, Amy G. [Auteur]
Washington State University [WSU]
Lépinard, Eléonore [Auteur]
Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne [UNIL]
Durovic, Anja [Auteur]
Centre d'études européennes et de politique comparée (Sciences Po, CNRS) [CEE]
Achin, Catherine [Auteur]
Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales [IRISSO]
Leveque, Sandrine [Auteur]
Centre d'Études et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales (CERAPS) - UMR 8026
Washington State University [WSU]
Lépinard, Eléonore [Auteur]
Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne [UNIL]
Durovic, Anja [Auteur]
Centre d'études européennes et de politique comparée (Sciences Po, CNRS) [CEE]
Achin, Catherine [Auteur]
Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales [IRISSO]
Leveque, Sandrine [Auteur]
Centre d'Études et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales (CERAPS) - UMR 8026
Titre de la revue :
French Politics
Nom court de la revue :
Fr Polit
Numéro :
18
Pagination :
28-49
Éditeur :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date de publication :
2020-03-06
ISSN :
1476-3419
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
parity
political party sanctions
women’s representation
political party sanctions
women’s representation
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This article assesses the pre-adoption, adoption, implementation and impact of party parity penalties established in 2002 to promote gender equality in the National Assembly. The analysis argues that while the penalties ...
Lire la suite >This article assesses the pre-adoption, adoption, implementation and impact of party parity penalties established in 2002 to promote gender equality in the National Assembly. The analysis argues that while the penalties were implemented and increased over the years and had some success in enhancing women’s numerical representation, from 12.3% of all MPs in 2002 to 38.7% in 2017, rather than being “more than meets the eye,” the parity sanctions were actually far less. The limited scope and authority of the parity penalties and the gender-biased norms of key gatekeepers and political elites in the political parties and the high courts have circumscribed the extent of the progress in women’s numerical representation and the quality of that representation; women MPs in the National Assembly still remain marginalized in a variety of ways in comparison with their male counterparts. Thus, the outcome of the party parity sanctions, in GEPP terms, is “gender accommodation” over “transformation.”Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This article assesses the pre-adoption, adoption, implementation and impact of party parity penalties established in 2002 to promote gender equality in the National Assembly. The analysis argues that while the penalties were implemented and increased over the years and had some success in enhancing women’s numerical representation, from 12.3% of all MPs in 2002 to 38.7% in 2017, rather than being “more than meets the eye,” the parity sanctions were actually far less. The limited scope and authority of the parity penalties and the gender-biased norms of key gatekeepers and political elites in the political parties and the high courts have circumscribed the extent of the progress in women’s numerical representation and the quality of that representation; women MPs in the National Assembly still remain marginalized in a variety of ways in comparison with their male counterparts. Thus, the outcome of the party parity sanctions, in GEPP terms, is “gender accommodation” over “transformation.”Lire moins >
Langue :
Français
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CNRS
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2023-10-31T13:07:55Z
2023-11-06T15:05:06Z
2023-11-06T15:05:06Z