Differences in non-linearities determine ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Differences in non-linearities determine retinal cell types.
Auteur(s) :
Trapani, F. [Auteur]
Spampinato, G. L. B. [Auteur]
Yger, Pierre [Auteur]
Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172
Marre, O. [Auteur]
Spampinato, G. L. B. [Auteur]
Yger, Pierre [Auteur]
Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172
Marre, O. [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Journal of Neurophysiology
Nom court de la revue :
J Neurophysiol
Numéro :
130
Pagination :
706-718
Éditeur :
American Physiological Society
Date de publication :
2023-08-19
ISSN :
1522-1598
Mot(s)-clé(s) :
functional classification
ganglion cells
nonlinearity
retina
ganglion cells
nonlinearity
retina
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
retina
nonlinearity
ganglion cells
functional classification
nonlinearity
ganglion cells
functional classification
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Classifying neurons in different types is still an open challenge. In the retina, recent works have taken advantage of the ability to
record from a large number of cells to classify ganglion cells into different types ...
Lire la suite >Classifying neurons in different types is still an open challenge. In the retina, recent works have taken advantage of the ability to record from a large number of cells to classify ganglion cells into different types based on functional information. Although the first attempts in this direction used the receptive field properties of each cell to classify them, more recent approaches have proposed to cluster ganglion cells directly based on their response to stimuli. These two approaches have not been compared directly. Here, we recorded the responses of a large number of ganglion cells and compared two methods for classifying them into functional groups, one based on the receptive field properties, and the other one using directly their responses to stimuli with various temporal frequencies. We show that the response-based approach allows separation of more types than the receptive field-based method, leading to a better classification. This better granularity is due to the fact that the response-based method takes into account not only the linear part of ganglion cell function but also some of the nonlinearities. A careful characterization of nonlinear processing is thus key to allowing functional classification of sensory neurons.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Classifying neurons in different types is still an open challenge. In the retina, recent works have taken advantage of the ability to record from a large number of cells to classify ganglion cells into different types based on functional information. Although the first attempts in this direction used the receptive field properties of each cell to classify them, more recent approaches have proposed to cluster ganglion cells directly based on their response to stimuli. These two approaches have not been compared directly. Here, we recorded the responses of a large number of ganglion cells and compared two methods for classifying them into functional groups, one based on the receptive field properties, and the other one using directly their responses to stimuli with various temporal frequencies. We show that the response-based approach allows separation of more types than the receptive field-based method, leading to a better classification. This better granularity is due to the fact that the response-based method takes into account not only the linear part of ganglion cell function but also some of the nonlinearities. A careful characterization of nonlinear processing is thus key to allowing functional classification of sensory neurons.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2024-01-15T22:33:18Z
2024-09-18T09:55:06Z
2024-09-18T09:55:06Z