University patent litigation in the United ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Titre :
University patent litigation in the United States: Do we have a problem?
Auteur(s) :
Ascione, Grazia Sveva [Auteur]
Bordeaux sciences économiques [BSE]
Ciucci, Laura [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Detotto, Claudio [Auteur]
Laboratoire « Lieux, Identités, eSpaces, Activités » (UMR CNRS 6240 LISA) [LISA]
Sterzi, Valerio [Auteur]
Bordeaux sciences économiques [BSE]
Bordeaux sciences économiques [BSE]
Ciucci, Laura [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Detotto, Claudio [Auteur]
Laboratoire « Lieux, Identités, eSpaces, Activités » (UMR CNRS 6240 LISA) [LISA]
Sterzi, Valerio [Auteur]
Bordeaux sciences économiques [BSE]
Titre de la revue :
Research Policy
Pagination :
104909
Éditeur :
Elsevier
Date de publication :
2024-03-01
ISSN :
0048-7333
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
University patents
Patent litigation
Patent assertion entities Licensing
Technology transfer
Patent litigation
Patent assertion entities Licensing
Technology transfer
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Economies et finances
Résumé en anglais : [en]
In an attempt to increase revenues from patenting activities, some universities have started in recent years to pursue “overzealous” strategies to monetize their existing patents, by selling them to the highest bidder and ...
Lire la suite >In an attempt to increase revenues from patenting activities, some universities have started in recent years to pursue “overzealous” strategies to monetize their existing patents, by selling them to the highest bidder and enforcing them in court. In this paper we find quantitative evidence that patent litigation has an adverse effect on university technology transfer activities, reinforcing prior findings by Shane and Somaya (2007). However, we empirically show that universities do not litigate aggressively over patent infringement: not only do they litigate much less than patent assertion entities (PAEs), but we also observe no increase in terms of their propensity to litigate over the last two decades. Nor do we find any evidence of aggressive litigation strategies.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >In an attempt to increase revenues from patenting activities, some universities have started in recent years to pursue “overzealous” strategies to monetize their existing patents, by selling them to the highest bidder and enforcing them in court. In this paper we find quantitative evidence that patent litigation has an adverse effect on university technology transfer activities, reinforcing prior findings by Shane and Somaya (2007). However, we empirically show that universities do not litigate aggressively over patent infringement: not only do they litigate much less than patent assertion entities (PAEs), but we also observe no increase in terms of their propensity to litigate over the last two decades. Nor do we find any evidence of aggressive litigation strategies.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Projet ANR :
Collections :
Source :