Pay all subjects or pay only some? An ...
Document type :
Pré-publication ou Document de travail
Title :
Pay all subjects or pay only some? An experiment on decision-making under risk and ambiguity
Author(s) :
Aydogan, Ilke [Auteur]
IÉSEG School Of Management [Puteaux]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Berger, Loic [Auteur]
IÉSEG School Of Management [Puteaux]
Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici [Bologna] [CMCC]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Theroude, Vincent [Auteur]
Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée [BETA]
IÉSEG School Of Management [Puteaux]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Berger, Loic [Auteur]
IÉSEG School Of Management [Puteaux]
Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici [Bologna] [CMCC]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Theroude, Vincent [Auteur]
Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée [BETA]
English keyword(s) :
Experimental methodology
Payment methods
Incentives
Ambiguity elicitation
Payment methods
Incentives
Ambiguity elicitation
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Economies et finances
English abstract : [en]
We investigate the validity of a double random incentive system where only a subset of subjects is paid for one of their choices. By focusing on individual decision-making under risk and ambiguity, we show that using either ...
Show more >We investigate the validity of a double random incentive system where only a subset of subjects is paid for one of their choices. By focusing on individual decision-making under risk and ambiguity, we show that using either a standard random incentive system, where all subjects are paid, or a double random system, where only 10% of subjects are paid, yields similar preference elicitation results. These findings suggest that adopting a double random incentive system could significantly reduce experimental costs and logistic efforts, thereby facilitating the exploration of individual decision-making in larger-scale and higher-stakes experiments.Show less >
Show more >We investigate the validity of a double random incentive system where only a subset of subjects is paid for one of their choices. By focusing on individual decision-making under risk and ambiguity, we show that using either a standard random incentive system, where all subjects are paid, or a double random system, where only 10% of subjects are paid, yields similar preference elicitation results. These findings suggest that adopting a double random incentive system could significantly reduce experimental costs and logistic efforts, thereby facilitating the exploration of individual decision-making in larger-scale and higher-stakes experiments.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Collections :
Source :
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document
- Between_RIS_R1_v_5.6.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document