Risk-aversion versus risk-loving preferences ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Titre :
Risk-aversion versus risk-loving preferences in nonparametric frontier-based fund ratings: A buy-and-hold backtesting strategy
Auteur(s) :
Ren, Tiantian [Auteur]
Xiangtan University
Kerstens, Kristiaan [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Kumar, Saurav [Auteur]
Indira Gandhi institute of Development and Research [ICIDR]
Xiangtan University
Kerstens, Kristiaan [Auteur]
![refId](/themes/Mirage2//images/idref.png)
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Kumar, Saurav [Auteur]
Indira Gandhi institute of Development and Research [ICIDR]
Titre de la revue :
European Journal of Operational Research
Pagination :
332-344
Éditeur :
Elsevier
Date de publication :
2024
ISSN :
0377-2217
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Shortage function
Frontier
Fund rating
Risk-loving preferences
Frontier
Fund rating
Risk-loving preferences
Discipline(s) HAL :
Économie et finance quantitative [q-fin]/Gestion de portefeuilles [q-fin.PM]
Économie et finance quantitative [q-fin]/Gestion des risques [q-fin.RM]
Économie et finance quantitative [q-fin]/Gestion des risques [q-fin.RM]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
The eventual risk-loving nature of preferences of investors has largely been ignored in the existing frontier-based fund rating literature. This contribution develops a series of nonparametric frontier-based methods to ...
Lire la suite >The eventual risk-loving nature of preferences of investors has largely been ignored in the existing frontier-based fund rating literature. This contribution develops a series of nonparametric frontier-based methods to rate mutual funds accounting for both mixed risk-loving and mixed risk-aversion preferences. These new methods are proposed by defining the corresponding shortage functions that can allow for increases in all moments, or increases in odd moments and reductions in even moments. The empirical part designs a buy-and-hold backtesting to test the out-of-sample performance of the proposed rating methods corresponding to different risk preferences on the actual MF selection. The evidence indicates that the backtesting strategies based on the output frontier-based rating models with risk-loving preferences exhibit an overwhelming dominance compared to most existing frontier-based and traditional financial ratings.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >The eventual risk-loving nature of preferences of investors has largely been ignored in the existing frontier-based fund rating literature. This contribution develops a series of nonparametric frontier-based methods to rate mutual funds accounting for both mixed risk-loving and mixed risk-aversion preferences. These new methods are proposed by defining the corresponding shortage functions that can allow for increases in all moments, or increases in odd moments and reductions in even moments. The empirical part designs a buy-and-hold backtesting to test the out-of-sample performance of the proposed rating methods corresponding to different risk preferences on the actual MF selection. The evidence indicates that the backtesting strategies based on the output frontier-based rating models with risk-loving preferences exhibit an overwhelming dominance compared to most existing frontier-based and traditional financial ratings.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :